kerry_grim Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I just orderd a Canon 70-200 f2.8 L lens and eventually I will purchase a 17-40 f4 L lens. I am still a film user and will need a circular polarizer which at 77mm will not a cheap item . What are thoughts on a warming polarizer? Now I see there is a polarizing filter built to Moose Petersons specifications. Does anyone have experience with this? Also, what are good brands to choose from? I am purchasing L lens for their optical quality so I can not see purchasing a cheap filter if it would reduce sharpness. Is the Canon polarizing filter worth the price? I will not be using any other filters in combination with the polarizing filter. Thank you much for your suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinder Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 If you have alot of diffrent thread size lenses or plan on it the cokin or simlar system may be for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenPapai Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I have actually never seen a Canon filter. B+W and Tiffens and Promasters I use, including circular polarizers, and low-profile filters for your wide angles. Warming filter--do you shoot digital? If so that is a waste of money (easier to do in the software). Polarization is obvilously the only thing you cannot fake post-processing so get a good P filter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bsd230 Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I would consider the moose filter because it does correct the cooling effect of the polarizer filter. But a slim filter would be best for the 17-40. I would buy b+w first and Hoya second. B+W is one of the best filter makers out there, I own a lens with a 82mm filter size and its definately worth your time to buy them on ebay, you will get them for about 1/2 the price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony_bichon Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I agree with Don up there that if you have more than 2 different thread sizes, it becomes financially advantageous to buy a holder system.<br> If you're not familiar with it, you screw on your lens a ring (~$12 USD) then onto that ring you place a filter holder (~$9 USD). You just need to buy rings for you different lenses.<br> Cokin is the leading brand for amateur.<br> However Cokin filters themselves are not of the greatest quality.<br> After using some of them for some time, including polarizer, I shed some money and upgraded to Singh-ray filters. Their polarizer and color enhancer are amazing.<br> <br> Some reference link:<br> <a href="http://www.cokin.com/">cokin</a> <a href="http://www.singh-ray.com/">singh-ray</a> <a href="http://www.leefilters.com/CPTS.asp?PageID=130">lee</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellavance Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 Hi, These two lenses take the same 77mm size filter. I have a B+W 77mm Kaeseman MRC Circular Polarizer and I'm extremely satisfied, as it never grabs to the lens threads. These can be found on eBay at huge discounts, or contact Freeman Ye - email: fye1111@hotmail.com - and tell him you're referred by Pierre Bellavance, or visit his website: http://shop.vendio.com/hkd I've purchased many filters from him. Pierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_simon3 Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I can't tell if the filters touch the lens on the 17-40 but it is scary to see how close the thin UV filters come to it. My polarizer isn't thin so I can't comment on that. On a full frame 17mm is quite something and personally I couldn't see myself using under 22mm on it. You may not need the thin polarizer if you of a like mind. It is common lore that the canon polarizer is expensive but not special. I personally have no idea. I really think that the debate about the value of multi-coat for UV filters is settled and most agree that the multi-coat is worthwhile. I think that since polarizers are supposed to stop the glare, the value of the coating is still unsettled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_m14 Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 Hey I have the same lenses, 17-40 and 70-200 F2.8, both 77mm filter size. When I was buying my lenses I posted a question here, got a slim for 17-40 and normal one for 70-200, they r HOYA, priced at 52 USD I think... however, I used Cokin filters too and I can't screw the filter holder on the slim filter - real pain in the ass when I want to use Cokin on my wide angle... then I have to change filters or shoot withouth the filter at all. Might just dump the slim and get the normal that I don't have to change filters in the middle of shooting, hope this helps. Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerry_grim Posted August 26, 2005 Author Share Posted August 26, 2005 Thank you everyone...very informative. Likely I will purchase a warming filter and will consider B+W which was a company that I was not familiar with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now