jake_holt Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Ok, so I need some advice here - the time is drawing near to replace the old 466Mhz G4 Power Mac. I'm considering 2 options - a fully loaded 20 inch iMac, or a Power Mac G5 with a 20 or 23 inch Cinema Display. All power differences aside, since the extra power of the dual-processor is nice but not necessary, I have decided that it has come down to price and monitor quality - Basically, if the screen on the iMac is the same quality as the Cinema Display, I'm going with the lower priced iMac, but if it's lower quality, it's time to ante up for the G5 Power Mac. I've used both and I can't see a difference right away, but I'd like to hear from someone who has some experience with both, especially any opinions about calibration - I use Photoshop intensively, so I don't want to end up with a crappy, low-end monitor that's impossible to calibrate. This will be my first LCD, as I've been using the old Apple 17" CRT for 5 years now. Thanks all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mawz Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 The display on the iMac IS a 20" Cinema Display. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_holt Posted June 12, 2005 Author Share Posted June 12, 2005 Cool - I wasn't sure if it was the same or if it was a cheaper technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tedharris Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 The 20 inch Apple Cinema Display and the 20" display on the iMac G5 are the same size but they are NOT the same screen. Go for the separate screen. Further the iMac has a low RAM limit so that if/when you uograde to CS 2 you will not be able to add sufficient RAM to use its full 3.5 GB RAM accessability. If you think the screens are the same take a well scanned large format image (say a 4x5 transparancy scanned at 1800 ppi on a Microtek 1800f) along on a CD or DVD and look at the differences ...... they are easily visable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_holt Posted June 13, 2005 Author Share Posted June 13, 2005 Thanks Ted, I may try taking a disc down to the Apple store and see if they'll let me try it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug_adama1 Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 Something else you may want to consider is noise. I?ve found that the fan that cools the processor in the iMac is quite noisy. This can be mitigated under the Energy Saver Preferences by clicking on the reduced processor performance, which reduces the time or eliminates the need for the fan at cost of reduced processor performance. Cheers, Doug Adama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis Peek Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I am going through the same process - 5-year old Apple 17" CRT and a Dual 500 Gigabit Ethernet G4. I am assuming that since the 20" iMac G5 is SWOP certified, it is at least on par with the 20" Cinema Display even if it is not the same LCD. The question is really is it adequate for your needs. I, too, use PhotoShop but my editing is on the light side. Regardless, I believe the iMac G5 20" will be a vast improvement over my 500DP G4! I'm headed to my local Apple Store this AM to look and I'll let you know what I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tedharris Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 The two are not even close if you are doing critical editing and do accurate, high quality scanning. I start out with 4x5 or 5x7 transparancies scanned on a Micritek 1800f or Optronics Colorgetter; thus, I am working with a file upwards of 300mb and as much as a gig before I start adding layers. If you are working with smaller scanned files, files from a digital camera or scans made on any of the Epson scanners or the Microtek i900 or Canon 9950 you may not be able to see the difference. A warning, do NOT look at the 23" Cinema display or you will come away a LOT poorer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uhooru Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I have the imac w/20" screen and it is S.W.O.P. certified, and does calibrate color very well. It is virtually the same screen as the 20" ACD. It is not the same screen as the 23" or 30", they are differnt. When doing my research I talked to the digital photo teacher at my school. He said that the 23" is slightly better than the 20" imac, but you would have to have extensive knowledge and experience in color calibration to get that extra bit of accuracy from it. He felt, the imac was a very very good screen and was getting one himself. The company he runs has been using macs for years and they are one of the very big professional digital shops in O.C., he knows his stuff. That doesn't make him the ultimate authority, but he had a strong emperically based opinion. So far, I'm getting very good results on mine with an Epson 2200, doing mostly B/W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisw_photog Posted July 21, 2005 Share Posted July 21, 2005 I work for an advertising agency for my day job and the one thing I can relate that might help is this, only art directors get the separate 23" displays while copyrighters get 20"iMacs. In speaking with the creatives they said the ACD's are better than the iMac G5s. I have the HP L2335 which is the same panel as the 23"ACD and it's simply amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now