fredus Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Hi there, What is the difference between these 2 films ? Which one is best ? They're pretty cheap ... Thanks ! Fred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r.t. dowling Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 They are probably the same thing, just different labeling or a misprint in the advertisement. Superia XTRA 400 replaced Superia 400 several years ago. Fuji no longer manufactures the non-XTRA version of Superia 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_watson Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 I'll muddy the already murky waters with this bit on Fuji ISO 400 edge codes. Fuji Superia Xtra 400 is CH-7; Fuji True Definition 400(a tweaked Superia?)is CH-11. I've yet to see the CH-11 variant around Toronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r.t. dowling Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 TrueDef 400 is a weird product. Fuji rates it at RMS 5 for grain -- same as Superia XTRA 800 -- and it has the same resolving power. I guess it might have a bit less contrast than the Superias, and maybe less saturation... but you'd get that, plus finer grain, with NPH/Pro 400H. I think I'd be inclined to shoot Superia XTRA 800, rated at 500 or 640, before I'd bother with TrueDef 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 R.T, where did you find a datasheet for True Def 400 CH-11? I finally finished up a 4-pack and probably could not tell the difference betweeen CH-7 and CH-11 in a double-blind study. Same salt-sprinkle grain in skin tones, as per attachment.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r.t. dowling Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 Data sheet for CH-11: http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/bin/True_Definition_DataSheet.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert lee Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 "...finished up a 4-pack and probably could not tell the difference" Interesting. The datasheet shows that it should be noticeably sharper than xtra 400 (but trading off more grain.) Maybe I'll test a few rolls next time I'm at Walmart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 The grain doesn't look like RMS 5 to me, but who can trust datasheets? Note how CH-11 is supposed to be lower contrast than NPH, but I don't see it. Characteristic curves max out at RGB 1.9 2.4 2.7 for new NPH but 1.9 2.2 2.4 for True Definition 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r.t. dowling Posted April 3, 2006 Share Posted April 3, 2006 Datasheets and RMS and curves aside, the best thing to do would probably be to perform a good side-by-side comparison of True Def 400 vs. High Def 400 and/or 400UC. Maybe toss in Pro 400H for good measure. Anybody up for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now