www.wesleyalmond.com Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 I was in the process of cleaning my Rokkor lens on my $5 Minolta A (rangefinder) What I thought was fungus was in fact the two rear elements had become completely separated. Since I couldn't recement the lens I cleaned off all of the cement residue. Now the question is How will this effect my pictures? I can place the element back into it's correct resting place BUT it's no longer cemented Like it should be.. Info info on this guys? <img scr="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a49/myequation/a.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_lofquist Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 You will get reflections from the two new lens surfaces, otherwise there may be little difference in performance. There is a possibility of Newton's rings which may be seen by looking at the lens, but I expect that this will have only minor effect on the final image. Try it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_lai Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 I seem to recall Mike Kovacs repaired a lens with edge separation by putting some WD-40 between the elements. Might be worthwhile contacting him for details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Gammill Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 I may be wrong, but isn't the refractive index of the cement a factor in lens performance? Of course, it may only be noticable wide open at high enlargements. I guess the best thing to do is try a few pictures and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Index doesn't matter much for such a thin layer. I've heard you can use the clear part of WD-40 after all the crud settles out- some astronomy people have done that with their big achromats. Personally, I'd order some Norland optical cement from Edmund and recement it, or just assemble it dry (and very clean to avoid scratches!) and see how it work. Should be fine. The correct balsam to do it the traditional way is very hard to find these days. It comes as a hard stick, not a solvent thinned liquid as used for microscope slides. It's also a PITA compared to the modern UV cure stuff. There are also clear 2-part epoxies, but I've no experience with those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_502260 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 I have a Canon 24mm f/2.8 FD lens which had separation of the rear elements. It was repaired successfully by Ken Ruth at Photography On Bald Mountain. The cost? More than $5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now