tedms gallery Posted August 13, 2006 Share Posted August 13, 2006 With my other cameras, I benefit from diopters, and am aware that there are some out there for the CL, but I've noticed varying nomenclature differences among vendors. First, my vision per my last RX is OK near, and I don't need reading, computer or other glasses. I do have a slight -1.xx rx for my R eye for distance viewing. On my Pentax *ist DL, I set the built-in diopter adjustment all the way to the right (lens facing forward), which in the manual indicates a +1.5 adjustment. On my Canon miniDV, I adjust it to the (-) mark. On my Sony hi-8, I adjust it all the way to one extreme, but there is no indication in the manual or on the unit if it is a positive or negative. In any case, I am quite sure I will benefit from a 1.0 or 1.5 diopter, but based on the confusion of the Pentax and Canon, I'm not sure if I need a + or - with the Leica CL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted August 13, 2006 Share Posted August 13, 2006 Different cameras have different built in diopters. Some label the diopter lenses with their own diopter, others label them with the "net" diopter when mounted on-camera. Single lens reflex cameras often have a native diopter of -1, such that the focusing screen appears one meter away. But, I think rangefinders often have a more distant virtual image. A net diopter of 0 means that the virtual image is at infinity. A net diopter of -1 puts it at one meter, -2 puts it at 0.5 meters, -3 puts it at 0.33 meters. Positive diopters put the image further than infinity. A true negative diopter will make the virtual image in the viewfinder closer to you, and smaller. A true positive diopter will make the virtual image in the viewfinder further from you, and larger. You could try on some drug store reading glasses with the camera to see the effects of positive diopter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miles_s. Posted August 13, 2006 Share Posted August 13, 2006 Ted, It is my understanding that diopters for the CL are hard to come by. This may make glasses the only remaining viable option. Love to know if I am wrong. miles PS I am stuck here in the UK with all this film that will be zapped into a permafogged state upon my return. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tedms gallery Posted August 14, 2006 Author Share Posted August 14, 2006 Thanks, I have found that I definitely need a negative diopter. Tried the reading glasses diopters at the drugstore with a RF and they all make things worse, the drugstores don't sell negative diopter glasses!! I have heard DAG may have some for the CL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now