jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 I bought this beat up Rolleicord I for only a little money just about the same time Sam posted his Rollei repair story. Pretty beaten up. I think it even has a Rolleicord II's hood. The view screen is virtually impenetrable and does not look to be stock. I haven't even begun to figure out where the various light leaks and what the focus issues might be. I got the camera because it was cheap and I wanted something with a soft lens.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 Here's a shot...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 Another one...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 Another...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 So there are obviously problems. One is that it tends to roll a fat roll, which I guess means that something might be bent. The other is this light leak - might be from the fat roll but also might be from the red window (which I don't use) or some other locations. Any suggestions? It is that inverted fan shaped leak that "necklaces" the lower part of the photograph.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 9, 2005 Author Share Posted June 9, 2005 I confess I have a weakness for beaten up cameras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in Austin Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Tsk, Tsk, making the old Triotar earns it keep. I also liked the shot done with Elke over on L forum. Nice work. Best Regards - Andrew in Austin, TX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandeha Lynch Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 It works OK - just needs a little TLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahams Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Jorn - I have the identical camera, which my father owned from new. The "leaves" that make up the viewfinder hood have all come adrift because the hinges have worn out - maybe this is why yours has been given a "new" hood? The viewing screen is dark and dingy even when clean, but a re-silvered or replacement mirror works wonders. There was a post here once that told how to salvage replacement mirrors from old Polaroid cameras, for this purpose. I don't remember who made the post, but perhaps they could remind us again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorn ake Posted June 10, 2005 Author Share Posted June 10, 2005 Thanks Andrew. I almost posted it here as that forum seems all digital now. Graham, yes I think you probably guessed it there. The hood that is on there is rather ingenious the way the magnifier flips up or functions down as the sportsfinder with the hidden mirror that flips up inside the hood. Amazingly functional and it still works! I think at this point I am just going to put the leak down to fat rolling and switch film over to Kodak, plus work on the pressure plate a bit. Kind of gunky and floppy. A little light seal around the edges wouldn't hurt either.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry_mobbs Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 I would check out the red window. Today's films react to light coming through that window. This is typical in folders as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now