images_in_light_north_west Posted May 2, 2006 Share Posted May 2, 2006 Has any one used the Kirk BH-3 ball head, I have a 30D and 300F4L with a TC 1.4x on it, will this the smaller of the Kirk heads be sufficient ? any body use and like or dislike this head ? your help would be appreciated. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey moore Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 I don't have any experience with this head, but a quick use of the search tool for "Kirk BH-3" will return 65 hits here on photo.net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheldonnalos Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 I use it and love it. I used it earlier tonight to support a 4x5 monorail with a Nikkor 210mm f/5.6 lens. That weighs about twice what a 30D & 300mm f/4 L weighs. It's more than capable, and you'll enjoy it as a high quality ballhead. That being said, if I had a hundred extra dollars at the time, I probably would have gotten the Really Right Stuff BH-40 ball head. Haven't seen it, but it's been really well received. Hope this helps! Sheldon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erick_kyogoku Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 Hi Ross. I just spent a week researching light weight, precise ballheads. I was at first interested in the Acratech Ultimate ballhead after reading so many gushing reviews, but was then turned on to the Kirk BH-3 and RRS BH-40. After much deliberation and a few questions here and elsewhere (click my name to see them), I decided on the RRS BH-40. It is a very recent product, looks like a smart design with quality manufacturing. It isn't much more than the Kirk BH-3, and for something that will last you for many years the price difference will soon be amortized.<p> <a href="http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/ballheads/index.html">Here</a> is a link to their website. You can get an idea for what this head is like by reading reviews for its older brother the BH-55 from <a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/ accessories/rrs-bh55.shtml">Luminous Landscape</a> and <a href="http:// www.outbackphoto.com/the_bag/pauls_rrs_bh55/essay.html">Digital outback</a>. Hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodrog Posted May 3, 2006 Share Posted May 3, 2006 I've had one for years and love it. It is very well constructed and supports my Nikon 80-200/f2.8 without any problems. It never creeps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
images_in_light_north_west Posted May 3, 2006 Author Share Posted May 3, 2006 Thanks for your input, decided on the Kirk BH-3, the RSS BH-40 would have been my choice if funds permited, a very nice option indeed but $120 more killed my budget, after all I have got to report this to the boss (wife) Thanks again, Ross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now