bob_mcbob Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 After spending several frustrating hours editing photos on differentcomputers, I've decided that Adobe Gamma just isn't cutting it anymore(not that it ever did...). So, I'm looking for a monitor calibrationproduct to get the various computers/monitors here in sync with eachother. I've looked at various calibration products in the past, but neverwanted to spend the money. I just checked out what's availablenowadays, and came up with a few options. The first option, theColorvision ColorPlus, seems to be universally regarded as crap, soI'm pretty much discounting that completely. The other two productsI'm considering are the GretagMacbeth Eye One Display (the originalone), which is $79.95 at B&H, and the ColorVision Spyder2, which is$179.95 minus a $75 mail-in rebate. I'm not really sure how these two products compare. The Spyder2 isobviously more expensive than the Eye One, even with the mail-inrebate I probably won't receive for three months. I have to pay $30for shipping from B&H either way, so the price difference isn't reallyall that great. If the Spyder2 is significantly better than the EyeOne in some way, I'd be happy to order it and wait for the rebate toarrive. I'm pretty sure both offer site licenses for the software, sousing them on multiple computers wouldn't be a problem. It would be great if I could hear some opinions on which product tobuy. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_mcbob Posted May 23, 2005 Author Share Posted May 23, 2005 Unfortunately, it seems the Spyder rebate is only available if you also purchase some expensive software. B&H conveniently neglects to mention that in their "Price after Rebate" notice! $180 vs. $80 is a pretty big difference, so it looks like my only options are the Eye One or ColorPlus. The Eye One is probably the better of the two... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry n. Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 I have never seen a review comparing monitor calibration products. Rarely do people on photo.net comment on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_rodney1 Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 There?s a link to a review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmic_c Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 Check out some of the comparative reviews on the net. One of the more comprehensive is <a href="http://www.drycreekphoto.com/Learn/monitor_calibration_tools.htm">Monitor Calibrators reviewed</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik scanhancer Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 The fact that independent profiling software like ColorEyes does not support the Spyder because of its bad reliability in terms of consistency should make you wonder if this is a good investment. The Eye-One Display is fully supported though. A quote from Jack Bingham (Integrated Color Corporation): "Unfortunately after testing the Spyder, we determined that it was not consistent from run to run. Since that is critical in maintaining a great monitor profile we chose not to support the Spyder." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_mcbob Posted May 24, 2005 Author Share Posted May 24, 2005 Thanks guys, I guess I'll probably be going with the original Eye One Display from B&H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiswick_john Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Eric - is that a reported inaccuracy from the old spyder or the new and very much improved Spyder2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_martin5 Posted May 26, 2005 Share Posted May 26, 2005 If you get the Eye One Display, download the latest software that is supplied with the Eye One Display 2. This software works with the Eye One Display and I think it gives you a better profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik scanhancer Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 "Is that a reported inaccuracy from the old spyder or the new and very much improved Spyder2?" I suppose it is meant for both as they are both not supported by the ColorEyes profiling software, while the other known brands are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now