picturesque Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Here is the location of the information. I guess I spelled it wrong. http://eosdoc.com/manuals?q=NEVEC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Bogdan, the image above was to demonstrate that the flash can freeze the moving subject, and register detail even thought the shutter speed is slow ... it has less to do with being color or B&W. Here's a B&W one using an even slower shutter speed , second shutter, and panning with the subject ...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afs760bf Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Now that's a great shot, Marc. I bet you didn't get any complaints from the client on that one. Who said wedding photographers weren't artists? Oh, sorry, that was another post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_clark___minnetonka_mi Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 I like using "shutter drag." I did this with sports photography back in the 60's whilst in College. I'm getting back into it with weddings, particularly with the dancing. To me it shows action, mood, happiness, motion, emotion. I'm also twisting the camera for some images and fooling around with the zoom whilst the sutter is open. My clients like this as I've had numerous orders from folks who seem to agree with me. This is what I like about digital, I can check what's going on instantly, adjust, re-adust, play some more, get up, get down, get moving around! Fun!<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrace Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Marc, yes I know. I was just curious to see it in color. I was also speaking in general that I prefer color vs. B&W with panning-type shots - that B&W seems more static to me for those shots. I don't know. What do you think of these two? Color or B&W? Thoughts?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrace Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 B&W version<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Both work Bogdan. I'd take a look at splitting the channels ... take the red channel mono, and maybe layer it over the green channel and fade the layer... it sometimes gives you a closer version of the color in terms of dynamics ... plus it often helps separate the subject from the background a little more. Like this:<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
picturesque Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 In case anyone is interested in the NEVEC story...I just tested my 20D and it does "do" NEVEC with both evaluative and averaging FLASH metering patterns, and evaluative ambient metering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrace Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Marc, thanks for the tip. I have to say that one of my biggest frustrations with digital (which is what I mostly use these days) is trying to achieve a good B&W look. I'm sort of Photshop stupid. I've read on Greg Gorman's technique, channel mixing, etc., but they seem to take too long for so many shots. I've seen many plugins but I would love to create an action that could work on most pictures after I desaturate them in ACR, because it would certainly speed up things. With CS2 and ACR 3.1, I do 90% of my editing in ACR directly. I hardly use PS now, except for minor things. I love it! And even in ACR I know I can play with the hue/saturation sliders once I desaturate, but that's slow too. What's the solution? Or is it one pic at a time? It seems like it almost has to be, but I'm not adept at knowing how to mix things to make a good B&W. What's your workflow for B&W? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Try using the temp and hue controls in ACR after you desaturate. They sort of act on the channel level like a filter would when shooting B&W film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rtrace Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Thanks Marc. I've been messing with that. I have to just mess some more ;) At least I've made the migration from a JPEG workflow to a RAW one with ACR 3.1 finally. I'm slow with these things, but willing to experiment and actually do all the time. But when it comes time to process pictures I get overwhelmed in a way with all the choices. I need to simplyfy, but to get to that stage I have to go through it all it seems. Just like I did with RAW. I feel my pictures are OK, but I need to improve my Photoshop/"developing RAW" skills. I'll get there eventually. I'd like to forget that though and still concentrate more on shooting, compositiong, angles, flash, light, but these are wild times! I still shoot film, but more for fun now. And it's like I just wish I could get such nice B&W prints from digital. I saw a recent post by Jeff where he said he's switched to 1DMKIIs and prefers the B&W control he has. So *I* need to get better. Soon I plan to get a 1D or 1Ds body/bodies and get even more serious. It fun and frustrating at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Bogdan, if you go for a 1DMKII (like Jeff is now using) contact me first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now