matlinek Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 I've done mostly digital work, and some 35mm B&W with Kodak Tri-X 400. I'm going on vacation in a couple days to a cabin on a lake, and I'd like to try out some 35mm color. Whats a good film to start out with? In this instance I'm going to be doing a lot of landscapes, sun setting on the lake, green fields, etc. But since I've never really worked with color film before I'd be interested in a very general, all-around film that I can adopt. Any reccomendations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Reala Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_taylor Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Kodak 400UC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_hicks1 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Dear Mat, A lot more depends on the lab than on the film. Any fresh film from a reputable manufacturer will deliver good quality, and the slower the film, the finer the grain as a very good general rule: I'd not go higher than ISO 400 if I were you. Cheers, Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com -- a site aimed mainly at film users) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markok765 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 For landscapes, fuji velvia 100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Any name brand ISO400 or slower C-41 is really very respectable at this point. Paying for good printing is MUCH more leveraged. You won't go wrong with Kodak Gold 100, 200, or 400, so long as it's reasonably fresh. Sure, Ultra Color 400 is cool film, as are Portra 400NC and 400VC. But without good printing, you may not notice (or care about) the difference... Unless you feel really confident about your metering and exposure technique, don't try the Velvia yet, or any slide film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enrique sf Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Velvia is renowned for its high contrast and saturated colors. Like most slide film, it has very little exposure latitude (if you bracket by 1/3 you'll easily see what gets blown out or underexposed). Slide film is like digital in that blown out highlights are unrecoverable, but with the high contrast blacks of Velvia, sometimes the the shadow ramp is very steep. Also note that Velvia can make skin look a bit orange. All those caveats notwithstanding, I shoot Velvia for travel almost exclusively because it's so damn gorgeous. See my Flickr set for examples. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ehuelga/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_graham3 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Consider where you will have it processed, and ask them questions! Today most labs see so little film coming in that they can't afford (or don't bother)making sure their machines are warmed-up, calibrated, and the chems refreshed. Then, once they develop the negs they run them through an automated scanner that scans them at the supposedly "right" resolution for the print size you select. The results are often pixellated and gross. The fact is, it takes the right hardware, software and a lot of expertise to make a scanned piece of film print as good as a digital capture, let alone a wet print made with an optical enlarger. That isn't to say it can't be done, but it's not a given that every lab can and will do justice to a neg nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 I am not an expert but from what I have read on photonet some films scan better than others. If that is a consideration for you, some online research may help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timcorridan Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 "fuji reala 100"<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gman Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 I would say bring both Fuji Reala and Kodak 400 UC. The Reala for sunny clear days and the 400 UC for overcast days and eves. You will be well covered with these two excellent films. Wayne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juergenf Posted May 22, 2006 Share Posted May 22, 2006 Mat, what is important is that you decide in advance where you will bring your film for processing. If its going to be the 1-hour drug store, there is no good reason to use expensive 'pro' films for they will be printed through 'consumer' film channels. I.E. a nice low contrast low saturation film will be printed with much more saturation and contrast because this is what the average consumer wants their prints to look like. They are not going to change these settings for the occasional roll of Reala because 99% of the consumers that use these labs, will drop off a roll of Gold or Superia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoff_samuel Posted May 23, 2006 Share Posted May 23, 2006 It depends on what look you want from your film, but as has been mentioned, the processing will make more difference than the type of film used. Starting out I would suggest any Fuji Superia or Kodak Gold film as they good all round films & are cheaper than the professional films, and can give excellent results. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now