Jump to content
Welcome to the NEW Photo.net! ×

Confused! M39=L39=LSM=LTM?


Recommended Posts

You just need the screw-mount to M mount adapter ring, as you suggest.

 

LSM=LTM. As to the M39 vs. L39, I'll defer to others, but I think that the L39 designation is the same as LSM/LTM and that M39 refers to the common enlarger lens specification used not just by Leitz but by just about every manufacturer of enlarging lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Russian Zenit 1, 2, 3, and 3M cameras used a 39mm threaded lens mount, but insted of the 28.80mm lens-film registration distance of the Leica cameras, they use a (approximately) 45mm lens-film distance. Not clear if they really use the 39mm x 26 turns per inch Leica thread, or a conventional 39mm x 1mm pitch thread. This mount is commonly known as M39 or ZM39.

 

At any rate, lenses for that camera will never focus directly on a Leica. They will also lack any moving cam on the rear of the lens to activate the rangefinder roller in the camera.

 

But, so far as I can tell, the Jupiter-3 is not one of the lenses ever made for that camera. That's because the 50/1.5 Sonnar design requires the rear element to be too close to the film to use on an SLR.

 

The Leica Thread Mount is known as LTM, LSM (Leica Screw Mount), and L39 (Leica 39). But it really shouldn't be called M39, since that really stands for Metric 39 threads, and the threads don't even use standard metric pitch.

 

So, you need an M adapter. Any will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add M-39 is the common name for the 44.5 registration that the Braun Paxette and Dejur rangefinders use it is the same diameter and pitch as the Leica thread mount. It is also used on early Zenit SLR's. That said it is common for people to misuse this and have it refer to the 28.9mm Leica thread mount registration lens. With a Jupiter being Zenit lens I would worry that it was in fact an early Zenit SLR lens. Does the lens have a RF cam or the brass circular ring to operate the Rf coupleing do you have a photo that shows the rear of the lens?

 

I collect Paxettes and Leicas so I have quite a bit of experaince with this confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is this new thing ?

- 39mm x 26 threads/inch

- 39mm x 1mm pitch.

 

Which one of these is the actual Leica Thread Mount? There is a minor difference between these two specs (26tpi = 0.9769 mm pitch), but I'm sure that difference is enough to screw up (well chosen pun, huh ?) the threads on both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A correction to my post where is wrote 28.9mm is should have read 28.8mm sorry

 

Leica std screw mount is 39mm X 26T per 1" pitch with a 28.8mm registration (distance film surface to lens mount mating surface)

 

The Braun Paxette M-39 mount is 39mm X 26T per 1" pitch with approx a 44.5mm registration (distance film surface to lens mount mating surface)

 

 

Any one of my 2 dozen Braun Paxette lenses will screw on a Leica body it just won't focus correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Syuji,

 

Any M adapter will work but obviously you should get the one that brings up the 50mm framelines. In the U.S., www.cameraquest.com is one convenient source for these adapters.

 

I have several Russian lenses, including the Jupiter 3, and they all work just fine on my M cameras with the proper adapter installed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leica's 39mm by 26 threads per inch was a deliberate curve-ball, to annoy those violating their patents and trying to make compatible lenses. Patents became moot in 1945.

 

Canon's first LTM rangefinder cameras had a 39mm x 1mm thread, and they are not compatible. The threads seize up when you try and tighten them. They figured this out pretty soon. They switched the lens threads to toally LTM compatible. For a while, the cameras had a "slop" mount, where the threads could take either lens threading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Syuji,

 

Some Jupiter 9's have focusing issues when used wide open at close to minimum focusing distance. Other than that, they work fine.

 

One caveat: Many have congealed lubricants which makes them almost impossible to focus, so if you're considering one, make sure it focuses smoothly as this is an expensive repair. Again, be sure to get the M adapter that brings up the 90mm frames.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not essential to get an adapter that activates the proper framelines. The Bessa

framelines are user-selected, so that's not an issue. But you might as well do it anyway, in

case you decide to use that lens on a different camera body in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...