Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A while back Araki the Japanese photographer came up in the

discussion. I didn't know much about the guy, but checked out some of

his work and quickly got back with a few choice words about him.

 

Anyway, for those of you who think Araki is so great, and for those

looking for inspiration, I am posting the brief review of a movie

about him from the Tokyo Classified. It is amazing what the Japanese

think is great, and how different that is from the rest of the world.

Kurosawa could not even find funding for his later films in Japan, and

was sponsored by Spielberg, et al instead:

 

Nobuyoshi Araki is probably the most famous living Japanese

photographer and this American-produced documentary is a bizarre piece

of hagiography. It drools over a man (and his highly explicit photos)

who made his name by trying to be as controversial as possible.

Filmmaker Travis Klose thinks he?s asking the pertinent questions

about Araki, who likes to shoot naked women bound and hanging

helplessly, or on the floor with their vaginas splayed open, but

actually he?s been conned by the self-aggrandizing scam artist who now

preaches an apparent new-found respect for women. We?re told Araki?s

insulation against feminist critique is a ?cultural difference,? while

Bjork lauds Araki and how his work obviously shows he loves his wife

deeply. Good thing she told us because the wife looks miserable. Did

anyone inform the American team that Araki?s headline-grabbing quote

prior to his massive fame was ?all women are whores?? I?m sure they

could find some expert to explain he meant this in the most respectful

way.

CINEMA 37

 

by Rob Schwartz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, so i find bjork pretty facinating for always doing something strikingly original- from her music, to her much discussed fashion, to her avant garde videos - but why is she being cited as though her support of any photographer immediately makes the photos legitimate. a celebrity likes a photographer. madonna likes obscure jewish sects. tom cruise is a scientologist. the japanese like araki, as do some others on this site. so what? this is one of those things that is fully within anyone's power to ignore. until you brought this up, i've never heard of him and, based upon your description of his photos, certainly won't be looking them up at work. if i so choose, i don't have to look at them at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>> It is amazing what the Japanese think is great, and how different that is from the rest

of the world.<<<

 

Speak for yourself. Araki has been exhibited at the Corcoran Gallery in Washington and at

major NY galleries and museums as well. My only problem with him is that I wish he would

publish fewer photos and select more. There is an interesting dialogue between Araki and

Moriyama in the catalogue published in connection with last year's Moriyama retrospective

at the Cartier Foundation. Also, Tokyo Classified is not where I go for art criticism of any

value.

 

--Mitch/Paris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobuyoshi Araki is an artist... and as such the value of his work is less in the subject and more in the over all handling of the medium and impact of the image. Making works of art allows for a great range of subject matter because it's an activity that focuses on the human condition. Whores, drunks and deviants have been celebrated through art in every age! You can't claim the moral high ground or judge artistic merit (good or bad) on the basis of subject matter.Rob Schwartz's review is just petty complaining.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Araki I've seen is porn, and not particularly interesting porn at that. He may have the highest artistic intentions, but he's picked a subject and an approach to that subject within which it is no longer possible to distinguish art from commerce. It's really hard to legitimately "document" such a self-documenting thing as the sex industry. Not that he shouldn't try, but I sure don't think he's succeeded.

 

Thanks to the mass proliferation of "erotic" images, it is now almost impossible to do anything valid in this arena. The best erotic art being done now is stridently non-explicit, because explicit is now utterly boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>To keep this post on topic, Araki often uses and M7 and I think an M6. Two of his recent books on Korea were shot with Leicas, and I have seen in other books a CLE hanging from his neck, usually with a lady or two. There is one book called something like "Araki and Leica" or "Leica and Araki"... something like that.</p>

 

<p>==================================-</p>

 

<p>Anyway, here is something you all ought to read:</p>

 

<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/critic/feature/0,1169,736248,00.html">http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/critic/feature/0,1169,736248,00.html</a></p>

 

<p>"Maybe I only had a relationship with her (His Wife) as a photographer, not as a partner," Araki has said. "If I hadn't documented her death, both the description of my state of mind and my declaration of love would have been incomplete. I found consolation in unmasking lust and loss, by staging a bitter confrontation between symbols. After Yoko's death, I didn't want to photograph anything but life - honestly. Yet every time I pressed the button, I ended up close to death, because to photograph is to stop time." He went on: "I want to tell you something, listen closely: photography is murder." His models, he continued, come to him demanding to be murdered. "Women always go home 'happy' after I take their pictures. I truss them up or shave them. Ha ha ha. Then I get love letters, saying, 'It was a happy day for me'." </p>

 

<p>I was at a Kinokunia book store in Shinjuku last night (went home with Stephen Shore's "Uncommon Places") and as usual, there were no less than a few dozen photo books by Araki for sale. The man puts out more books in a year than most photographers do in 20.</p>

 

<p>Here is an interview: <a href="http://tokyonewsline.com/entertainmentline/nobuyoshi_araki.html">http://tokyonewsline.com/entertainmentline/nobuyoshi_araki.html</a></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would those of us "who think Araki is so great" be influenced/concerned by the review

you quote? If we think he's "great" then presumably we're already familiar with his work.

I'm not aware of anything produced by Araki that matches the crass, offensive, insensitivy

of your regular rantings about the current state of Japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...