Jump to content

Quid custodiet


struan_gray

Recommended Posts

<center>

<img src="http://www.sljus.lu.se/People/Struan/pics/tforum.jpg"

width=500 height=500 vspace=5 alt="Tokyo Forum"></p>

<i>Security at the Tokyo Forum</i></p>

</center>

 

<p>

 

This image has a lot of sub-images buried within it. I've been having

fun picking out some I like (particularly <a

href="http://www.sljus.lu.se/People/Struan/pics/tforum2.jpg">this</a>)

but can't decide what others might prefer to look at. My instinct is

just to print it big and let the viewer choose for themselves. Any

contrarians here?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool image. Reminds me of a cross between an erector set and the

Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris with all the tubes you walk

through, etc. Like Michael Meyer's "Bokaap, Capetown, South Africa,"

the "people" aspect is somewhat diminished, but in this one the people

below and the person atop are not as hidden. The people here show the

overall scale perfectly. I like the whole picture better than the

portion you link to. I like the great feeling of foreground to

background depth. I also like the logical sense of dark on bottom,

light on top. Also, I would be afraid to death to walk through one of

those things, as I can hardly walk through a second story sky-bridge!

Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’  _ ,    J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am astounded by the sensibility that allows an architect to think

that this is a good environment for people to spend most of their

lives in. It looks like a really fun place to visit, but I'd hate to

work there 40+ hours per week. It kind of reminds me of that Borg

spaceship/artificial planet on StarTrek, The Next Generation, but

sunnier. Maybe a Borg Shopping Mall (where's the StarBucks?). I

expect there are little androidish cyborgs plugged into the "network"

in bajillions of cubicles (like a prison cell?), being fed data and

Soylent Green...<p>I like the picture like it is, crop wise, but the

color (even as cool as it is) makes the place seem friendlier than I

want to imagine it. Desaturated (or shifted?) to a monochrome might

make it <i>really</i> intense. I think John's right, about 2.5 meters

square oughta do it. Is it a square neg? I hope so... t<p>p.s. I

think it's overwhelmingly about "people".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<html>

Thanks for the vote of confidence folks. The image is most of a 6x6

transparency so it should enlarge nicely. Practical considerations

max out my darkroom at 30x40 cm in colour, but perhaps if I win the

lottery I'll go for a mural.</p>

 

<p>

 

I like to think that the atmosphere is at least partly my doing,

although sometimes I feel that my photographs of buildings are merely

repeating ideas which found expression long ago in the mind of the

architect. I think avoiding that is why the people are so important -

just as a figure in a landscape can direct the viewers response beyond

the scenery.</p>

 

<p>

 

Opressiveness is one element, but I also wanted to show the security

guards as reluctant angels, leading an exalted but tedious life at the

top level of all that grandeur while life goes on elsewhere. I can't

show it on the web, but in addition to the pair on the gantries there

are two more peering over one of the parapets on the left.</p>

 

<p>

 

Sticking with friendly colour is deliberate. It <i>is</i> a huge barn

of a building, but the sunken base level hums with life, and it seems

to be a popular place to break out the bento box come lunchtime.

Shown larger, it's really obvious that the guard's uniforms are royal

blue, which adds a touch of whimsey and stops things getting too

opressive. I agree that it would be possible to make an interesting

print by emphasising the Metropolis aspects, but that's not at all how

I felt when I was there. Perhaps I'll change my mind if someone posts

a suitably-doctored B+W example - feel free to help me see.</p>

 

<p>

 

Tony, I've always loved being high up, but I am superstitious enough

to prefer even crumbling and rotten rock to most man-made structures.

The walkways are pretty wide, so it is possible to not-look-down. I'd

definitely recommend the Forum as worth visiting for any Tokyo-bound

photographers, especially as it is one of the very few things open on

a monday. How it looks depends how you look:</p>

 

<p>

 

<center>

<img src="http://www.sljus.lu.se/People/Struan/pics/tfsketch.jpg"

width=300 height=300 vspace=5 hspace=5 alt="Sketching in the Shadows">

<img src="http://www.sljus.lu.se/People/Struan/pics/tfguard.jpg"

width=300 height=300 vspace=5 hspace=5 alt="Guarding the future">

<img src="http://www.sljus.lu.se/People/Struan/pics/tfbento.jpg"

width=300 height=300 vspace=5 hspace=5 alt="Bento Break"></p>

<i>Alternate viewpoints</i></p>

</center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris, "Quid custodiet ipsos Custodes" is a bit of cliche among those

trying to sell security equipment and software. I have to look these

things up in books, so of course it's the bastardised version I

couldn't find that lodges in the brain.

 

<p>

 

Christel, it is a slightly odd theme to persue into a building that is

literally the forum for a capital city, but I was encouraged by the

feel of people quietly conducting their private lives in public. For

example, the man in the light overcoat in that last picture has a

complete three course lunch spread out on the bench. Juvenal

originally said "Who guards the guards" ("Quis custodiet...") in the

context of locking up your wife to prevent adultery - the implication

being that human nature can't be supressed.

 

<p>

 

Wayne, I can live with one out of four. You should just be grateful I

didn't show the one where the people are blurred. One reason I've

moved up in format for my travel photography is that I'm conciously

trying to give my subjects more space, and in some cases to play with

compositions that lack a single main centre of interest - Chinese or

C17th landscapes rather than Meunchisms. Current technology makes it

hard to convey here, but at least some of the clutter evaporates as

the reproduction improves, and small details clarify, which makes what

'point' there is a bit less obscure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...