olli.pekonen Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I'm planning to use light painting techniques to light tuned cars of a car club in street surroundings at night time. Due to light pollution in the streets, the conditions are challenging: it is not easy to create bright enough "painting light" to create substantial contrast of the highlighted main subject and background. A hotshoe flash fired tens of times is totally inadequate. Has anyone tried a similar setup: a) not completely dark surroundings b) on-location work c) large subjects (in the size of a car). My next guess would be using a halogen floodlight powered by generator... getting a bit clumsy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_jovic Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 HI Ollie I have done this quite a few times however it has usually been at the end of a shoot where the light has gone and I've simply played around to get an 'effect' good bad or indifferent. It often works well, sometimes rendering the best shot of the day, simply because it looks a little unusual. I've used my headlights to light the car as it drives by, painting with light but the wrong way around where the car moves instead of the light. Several pics on my web site are lit this way www.jjphoto.com.au I've used a powerful torch to fill the details during sunset shoots and to illuminate the entire car, painting it with light. I've also used a handheld flash to light the car from several different angles whilst walking around the car, and this also works OK. You will have several problems to consider. 1/ You need to test whatever technique you choose to use so either shoot polaroids or use digital and make adjustments on the fly. 2/ If the street lighting around you is too bright then move to a darker area rather than fighting an impossible battle. To paint the car with light you'll need several minutes whilst most street lighting will give you a complete exposure within 15 to 30 seconds at a normal f stop so you might have to rethink and simply find a slightly darker location, but with the feel you are after. 3/ flare (check the roids or digital). 4/ reflections of the lighting in the panels of the car (check the roids or digital). If you walk around a car with a light pointed at it then a light trail will be reflected in the panels. JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn_hooper Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Some of those super (1M candlepower) brite spotlights. Some come with their own power (battery) and some plug into your cig. lighter. They should be brite enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill c. Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Due to light pollution in the streets, the conditions are challenging: it is not easy to create bright enough "painting light" to create substantial contrast of the highlighted main subject and background. A hotshoe flash fired tens of times is totally inadequate. Has anyone tried a similar setup: a) not completely dark surroundings b) on-location work c) large subjects (in the size of a car). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. Used to do this all the time, in the days before digital. You don't have to find a completely dark area, just a very dark area. As long as the streetlamps are a hundred yards or so away--sometimes half that will do, depending on how bright they are and which way they're pointed--they usually don't have that much effect on the image. They can tint it, but it's usually via glance lighting that adds interesting effects to the edges of the car. When I did it with Vivitar 285's, I'd set the exposure at f16 or f11. I'd find a dark place in the parking lot where my meter said the ambient would require an exposure time of at least a minute to register at that f-stop, and rely on reciprocity failure to make that even less. With digital you won't have the reciprocity failure to help you out, but do some experimentation. If you can get a powerful battery pack that will get your flash to recycle very quickly, you can get by with shorter exposures. I usually liked to work with a minimum of 30 seconds or so, but if you work really, really fast you can get in a good ten pops in half that time. Best of luck, and happy shooting. -BC- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sc21 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 Great answers. In fact, I've never thought of doing this, but now I'm going to give it a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_r1 Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 With a reflective object like a car, it may be easier to use a flashlight than small flashes. Maglites have a focusable beam which gives you more control. I also use 15W Halogen bicycle lights (Nite Rider) with great success, and the batteries last a long time. In many cases a 1 million power or stronger flashlight may be too strong, but these can be useful for lighting very dark areas or backgrounds. Gels can be used to control color temperature and for color effects.<br> <br> Oftentimes at dusk you will be able to get a 30 second exposure in a darker area if you stop down. This is usually enough time to add some painting effects. I generally try to schedule shoots like this within 2 days on either side of the full moon - once it gets dark you can keep on shooting, and the exposures can range from 4-10 minutes depending on your aperture. Experiment & have fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olli.pekonen Posted March 1, 2005 Author Share Posted March 1, 2005 First, thanks for the really cool answers. They helped a lot. Here's a try of my Volvo V70 midst a cold cold winter night in Finland. The car is dirty, but still shines a bit oving to this treatment. Specs: 300W halogen floodlight (meant for indoor renovations) worth $10 used (needs power cord). 8 secs at f16, ISO100. Canon EOS20D with Sigma 17-35mm. This is the result of about the 3rd try. Things to do and not do: 1) walk straight and smoothly - sweep the car with light, do not jerk it. 2) avoid spillage of light backwards. The unit is not light tight automatically. 3) use dark clothes 4) experiment with different heights. 5) avoid tripping the tripod with the cord 6) rehearse especially the first and the last second of this job Have fun with this technique. With proper equipment, I think it could replace far more complicated flash setups used in car studios.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randall paul Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Great subject guys as I always normally combine hot light with custom made lights for painting Now only digital applications as it is faster and cheaper. Experiment as above mentioned rehearse. I normally find I like longer exposure times for combined painting though Good luck RP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithpic Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 With a little photoshop work, and the right kind of light it can work ok. This (http://www.smithpic.com/lightpaint.jpg) is a 100watt light, with skrim on the front, and masked slightly. Three images comped together afterwards. Each image was a 10 second exposure. Crucial that you have a good tripod/stand. Clearly I'm not pointing the light AT the car... *TIP* The highlights you see are a reflection of the light being moved, at no point aside the the seat inside the car was the lighting ever pointed at the car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now