m_. Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 a two fold question: 1) how well a collapsable summicron 50/2 m-mount works with a m6 and how well the lens perform? and 2) how does the performance of the lens compared to minolta m-rokkor 40/2 (cle version)? guess it is a three fold question then. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pensacolaphoto Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 1. The collapsible Summicron should work well on all M bodies. 2. It is one of the most liked Summicrons due to giving nice results. 3. The M-Rokkor may be sharper wide open, but overall they are comparable in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicamshooter Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 The collapsible is a low contrast lens wide open, but with very pleasing out of focus rendition. This is nice for portraits. I haven't used the rokkor, but as was mentioned already, I'm sure it's better wide open, and more compact? I use the collapsible lens on my M3. These lenses are pretty old now, so a few clean marks won't affect it too much, but a lot of marks will cause it to want to flare even more. If this is going to be your main lens, then wait around for a clean one, and then send it to Sherry for a full CLA. The coatings are very soft, so slap a UV filter on it, and the 12549 elmar hood keeps the lens more compact than the current version. Do a search for it on photo.net and you'll come up with more info than you wanted on the great and poor qualities of the lens. Good luck! <p> <img src="http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b5dd35b3127cce90f98 2bd6d6e00000046138AaMmbNizZOH"> <p> Shot wide open, 100 Gold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Blackwell Images Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 The 40mm Summicrons (and the Minolta equivelents) are very sharp lenses. I agree with Raid, assuming we're talking bout a collapsible Summicron that isn't cloudy and/or littered with scratches on the front element. However, a lens with cloudy and/or scratched elements isn't necessarily useless. Depending on the severity of the problem, they can be wonderful portrait lenses for work in black and white. “When you come to a fork in the road, take it ...” – Yogi Berra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabophoto Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Wentong, I keep a 50/2 collapsible in addition to my 50/2 current optical version simply because I like the bokeh better. Carsten http://www.cabophoto.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuart_richardson Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 I am with Carsten -- I like the collapsible better for portraits and out of focus rendition, but the modern version has much more contrast and is easier to handle (smoother focus, no infinity lock, more barrel to grip etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_. Posted March 15, 2005 Author Share Posted March 15, 2005 thank you all. Carsten: I love those images of your on your web, especially the cuban ones. beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 collapsible nice, rigid better, DR best of the older Summicrons IMHO. 40 Rokkor nice lens but without the Leica build quality, again IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now