sam starkey Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I know you are out there and you know who you are.You are the person who gives a raiting of 1 for originality and 1 for ascetics for photographs of nude women, when other (real photographers) give raitings from 7 to 3 for a good shot and they will usually give you constructive criticism on your work which I appreciat.You however must be giving raitings for morality or ethics or God knows what. May I tell you something? You are on the wrong web site, this is about photography. If you don't like what you see,don't look at it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_w. Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Why don't you just e-mail the person directly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam starkey Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 Don't know who it is . Do you? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 The 1/1 "I hate nudes" raters just balance out the "I love nudes" 7/7 raters, so all is well with the universe once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I don't see many 1/1s balancing out 7/7s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam starkey Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 Thanks: Bob Atkins. You are the only one thinking clearly in this matter.I just don't like injustice for myself or others. I feel better allready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micheleberti Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Might be someone simply do not like them. Or du u think that simply a couple of tits are enought to get as many 7s as u wish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_nally Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 .[.Z is right. Aren't most 1/1 removed automatically?<br>There should be a process that removes all 7/7 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_b21 Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 On the olimpics for every 10 judges the highest and the lowest marks are eliminated to avoid biasing. For every 10 ratings, you could do the same and the usual 7/7 "mate rating" and the 1/1 "hate rating" would be eliminated from the average. Just a though. B. B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_w. Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Forget about ratings. You like it, that's why you post it, no? Would anyone post a photo they didn't like? What do you want, a trophy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smooch Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Who gives a Fu_k what a person rates a photo? If they won't leave a critique to hell with there 1.5 second thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wheely Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 I'm with Earl on this one. I find myself spending more and more time at photosig these days because although you get loads of ratings here, I've found the number of actual useful critiques is very low. there are some very notable exception mind you. <p> A strange by product, I've noticed is that I am far more willing to post a photo I consider an experiment to photosig because I can learn from it. However, I find PN is a place where I feel the quality of my shot must be better because generally speaking I'm only going to find out if anyone else likes it. Maybe that's what PN prefers though as I haven't been here long enough to know what the aims of PN are. <p> I am a photo newbie and any constructive critique I receive is worth six weeks on the TRP (not that I'm ever likely to appear there!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smooch Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Yes Mark your right, it stems from the all incompasing need of Americans to be "LIKED" (puke) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimknowles Posted February 3, 2005 Share Posted February 3, 2005 The book is by Dale Carnegie. Written back in the 1930's. The fact is ALMOST EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING ON EARTH wants to feel important. Just a fact. It's the way we are wired. IF all images submitted for critique (or not) were given 3 days of ANONYMOUS and EQUAL time for EVERYONE to rate this site would be a LOT MORE FUN! imho//jvk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zafar Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Interesting suggestion and I hope this is practical to be implicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now