scott_dordick Posted November 18, 1998 Share Posted November 18, 1998 We have a new product for medium format film. It is a weather proof, lightweight, billet aluminum 120/220 film can. Come check it out at acratech.net <p> Thanks, any feedback would be appreciated. Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew l. booth Posted November 18, 1998 Share Posted November 18, 1998 Scott - your link doesn't work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_wilson2 Posted November 18, 1998 Share Posted November 18, 1998 I'm sure it works well and I can appreciate a nicely machined piece of aluminum, but at $15.95 per I don't think I'll be buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_black Posted November 18, 1998 Share Posted November 18, 1998 $16 for a film canister? Are you crazy? I'm sure there will be some people with more money than sense that will buy your overpriced product, but I'll never be one of them. I'll keep on fattening myself on M&M mini's and keeping the free plastic containers that come with them. And the plastic is certainly more crunch resistant than an aluminum tube! I'll spend my money on film, or at these prices, a new lens! What a RIPOFF!! <p> Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian_c._miller Posted November 19, 1998 Share Posted November 19, 1998 Those <a href="http://www.acratech.net/">Acratech</a> cans look like a tank could roll over them with little effect. I use plastic cans with a snap-on lid. They are available at a local photo store (<a href="http://www.glazerscamera.com/">Glazer's Camera</a>) for a few bucks in a three-pack. I would spend a little more for a screw-on lid. If I don't keep my film in the plastic cans, I keep it in one of those insulated lunch bags. <p> Honestly, the only time I have had film ruined was from me misloading the camera. Then when I opened the back, the film roll was loose, and film was thus exposed to light. Nothing helps for that except for unloading the camera in a dark bag. <p> Your ad should say that the can is waterproof, as it does have an O- ring in the lid. "Positive seal" doesn't convey the idea. There is a <b>very</b> limited market for something like this, like maybe taking MF equipment white water rafting. <p> Hasselblad and Rollei owners should be buying stuff like this. They've already spent $10,000 on the camera and lenses, $16 for a nearly indestructible film can should be pocket change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_tai Posted November 19, 1998 Share Posted November 19, 1998 These film cans look great but I would think twice about air travel with these things since they can be mistaken for shells in the x-ray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chun_in_martinez Posted November 19, 1998 Share Posted November 19, 1998 It doesn't match with my Hassy but it sure goes with my Glock and Mag-Lites. But yes it's kinda expensive. If you lower the price I'll by 10 or so. And please make your web site more friendly. Don't ask for credit card information in your information request form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_dordick Posted November 20, 1998 Author Share Posted November 20, 1998 Thanks for the feedback, please keep your responses coming. I can now see the price is a bit high for most people. I am going to try to lower the the price but it is difficult because the retail price is derived from the cost to manufacture, plus the mark up by wholesalers and retailers. They are a top quality product and I am going to work on lowering the price. Thanks, Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_urban3 Posted November 20, 1998 Share Posted November 20, 1998 Scott, for what it's worth, if they were $5 each I'd buy 'em, and quit using tin foil to wrap exposed 120 film in to prevent light leaks. Tin foil, although it is nowhere near as elegent, it doesn't have a screw-in top to loose either. <p> Price them right and you'll sell a boat load. Go for volume, because someone else is all too likely to come up with clone version made of cheaper plastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trace_dibble1 Posted November 21, 1998 Share Posted November 21, 1998 Scott:I LOVE the cannisters. I do a lot of backpack & tripod outdoor photography, and these are just the sort of high-quality container I've been looking for. <p> Having said that, I agree with the other guys--I can't stomach the idea of spending several hundred dollars to can enough film for a single outing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted November 21, 1998 Share Posted November 21, 1998 Brian is right; relative to the cost of accessories for a Rollei or Hasselblad, $15 is inexpensive. But a 50 pack (for someone on a shoot, say) would cost $750, which is expensive for a non Hasselblad/Rollei branded product. For comparision, A spare back would be about $1000 for a Rollei, say. Have you considered selling them via the manufacturers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian_c._miller Posted November 23, 1998 Share Posted November 23, 1998 The problem with bringing the price down on these cans is that they are hand tooled. Did you guys look at what else that company makes? Prototypes. By no stretch of the imagination is this a fully automated setup, capable of batting out thousands an hour. <p> Even though enough for a real shoot would run nearly the price of a spare back, their useable lifetime is indefinite. The only real problem is losing them. <p> <b>Scott</b>: Maybe an aluminum 5-pack is a better idea. A clam- shell design with an off-the-shelf O-ring might be much better than individual canisters. There is a leaded plastic 3-pack for airport X- rays, but nothing that matches a pro-pack. It wouldn't need to be conformal molded, just fit five across. It could use a built-in, claw-like, hinge design. I'd much rather spend $20-$30 for a five- pack than $16 for a single tube. <p> Any plastics manufacturer could make something similar. Like I said earlier, the current alternative is a plastic container with a pop- top. The top can (and sometime does) pop off from pressure changes. Any manufacturer making wooden match stick containers already has the basic design for this. No design change there, except for size. <p> <b>Everybody besides Scott:</b> <p> Come to think of it, PVC pipe is a good alternative. They make black or white pipe with a diameter close enough to comfortably fit a 120 roll. Cap one end, and put a threaded cap on the other. Put yellow heat-shrink tubing around it or paint it so you won't loose it, and you're set. :) <p> Sorry, Scott. I've just blown away your market to everyone handy enough to use a hacksaw, knife, and glue. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_montgomery Posted November 23, 1998 Share Posted November 23, 1998 Try www.Porters.com they have three different film holders for Medium format film for very reasonable prices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_chow Posted November 23, 1998 Share Posted November 23, 1998 Speaking of film canisters, Fujifilm does make a 5-pack plastic canister for 120/220. They had a promo back in April in Japan whereby if you bought 10 rolls of any Fuji 120/220 film, you received (on the spot) one free 5-pack canister. They're made from thick, gray plastic and have "Fuji Film" moulded into the lid. The lid slides on, and he film is well-protected from light/moisture (but not waterproof). They're great, and didn't cost me anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now