michael_beckmann Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Agfa and Kodak make aerial film, and apparently they have updated their emulsions. They are not selling you old film, and they are not selling you emulsion technology from 20 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titrisol Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 I tried to find the tech sheets for those new aerial films, anybody had luck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_beckmann Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 http://aerial.agfa.com/ http://www.kodak.com/go/aerial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titrisol Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Thanks!200-400 lp/mm WOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 Pablo, I followed the links but didn't find "200-400 lp/mm". Where did you get the numbers? Cheers, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titrisol Posted February 10, 2005 Share Posted February 10, 2005 in the pdfs for aerial films, specially the BW are supposed to have that much resolution Aerographic film MX 2407 160 - 250 lp/mm Panatomic-X 2412 400 lp/mm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martian bachelor Posted February 12, 2005 Share Posted February 12, 2005 <I>"Lenses - Custom made. Is that better than what a tradional company who has years of experience making hight quality large format lenses could produce? Dont know."</I><P> If you read the info at the website you'll see that it is by an appreciable factor. They considered off-the-shelf commercially available lenses and found them wanting because of the fairly hi-res film they were using. They spent something like a year on just the ultra-wide angle lens design (about the equivalent of a 65mm on a 4x5). I thought that was pretty impressive - as was the shot of the climbers stuck like flies on the upper part of El Capitan.<P> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ardeshir_mehta1 Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 I wish *I* had a camera like that - I could shoot pictures more aestheically pleasing *and* get the sharpness I want. I don't think we can underestimate sharpness, especially in landscapes - after all, Ansel Adams did not shoot 35 mm, now did he. Still, I think FOUR Gigapixels is overkill. I'd be satisfied with 0.5 to 1 Gigapixels. (I already get something like 200 megapixels from my 4x5 Velvia 50 slides.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_downing Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Hi Guys, If you would like see the full image of about the same resolution on the web you can take a look at a project that I just completed http://www.xrez.com/ Now I know that this is not a large format film project precisely and you are all large format film guys but if you are interested in seeing more detail in an image you will probably enjoy this. Our hero shot was taken from the diving board in Yosemite, very near the spot that Ansel Adams shot "Monolith, Face of Half Dome" we timed the shot so it was half in shadow as it was when Ansel shot it but we also captured the rest of the valley. The final resolution of the image is 3.8 gigapixels and I split the image into 100,000 256x256 jpgs and delivered it via a google maps hack. This might be a method to show large format photographs on the web as well. I hope you like it! -Greg Downing http://www.xrez.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now