Jump to content

36-exposures, Negative Sleeves, Contact Sheets, Final Prints and The Man


Recommended Posts

This is going to be a very conspiratorial and circular question:

 

So I just started processing film at my house. Pretty awesome. I

almost always shoot 36exposure rolls. Now, I was just looking into

negative sleeves. I usually buy 8x10 paper, just because it is a good

cheap size for a student. If I want to make a contact sheet, my

negatives have to be cut to 5 exposures per piece. That leaves me with

1 strand negative. I could combine this last negative with the last

piece and make two 3 negative sheets. Then I'd have to use *two*

negative sleeves per roll, which sounds kinda wasteful and pricey.

 

Then I make the contact sheet. I'll need more than an 8x10 for this!

So now I have to use one 8x10 and then a fourth of another 8x10. No

problem, I guess.

 

Then I make the print. Why do we have 8x10s? That means if I want to

print full size, I'd have to crop from my negative. I usually don't

shoot film planning on cropping. So then I have to reduce the size and

not use the entire sheet. Which i wouldn't normally care about,

except that will force me to do custom matting for each print I wish

to frame!

 

Okay, so I'm sure others experience this problem? Am I being

inefficient? Is there something I could do better to ease these

processes? What do you guys do? Or should I just shut up and take it

like a man?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you guys are too logical. I never thought about cutting off the film grids in my contact sheets. Yeah, that makes sense. I own sheets that are 7 strips of 6 frames. They're perfect for contact sheets if I don't print the grids. I don't mind if I lose that last frame. Thanks.

 

But what about the prints and frames?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd just shoot 35 exps. I find that the rows of six don't contanct

print well. And 8X10 paper is around because of 8X10 film. 35mm

film is only a small percentage of the market, most of which lives

and dies by the demands of the 8X10 large format B&W consumer :).

Seriously, though, 6X9 is a very nice print size, and it fits nicely

on an 8X10 sheet. You want to leave a little border for aesthetic

reasons anyways, don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solution: Shoot 35 exp on a 36-exp roll, cut into seven strips of five each, use a Printfile page designed for this format to sleeve your negs. These pages contact-print on 8x10 paper just fine (you may lose the edge of one of your strips). 35mm negs have an aspect ratio of 1.5, while 8x10 paper has an aspect ratio of 1.2. There is no way around this. Either crop to 8x10 and compose accordingly while shooting or do as the others have suggested and print 6x9 on the 8x10 paper. Find somewhere cheap to purchase mats cut to these dimensions and you'll be golden. A 6x9 print matted in an 11x14 frame gives a pleasing 2.5-inch border all around.

 

Now, if there was only a convenient way to contact print 10 6x7 frames on a 8x10 sheet, we'd be golden...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be easier for you to find 8.5 X 11" paper for making contact prints. This way you can leave your negatives in 6 strips of 6 negatives each. I use the sleeves which have room for 7 strips of 6 exposures. This way if I am using a bulk loaded roll and I have a 37th or 38th frame I have room for the extra negatives. It also helps when I use a Rollei 35 and routinely get more than 36 frames. Some people like to use the 8.5 X 11" paper and store the proof sheets in a 3 ring binder.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...