jmoody Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 I vaguely remember reading somewhere once or twice that a good rule of thumb for shooting non-tripod shots is to use the inverse proportion (probably differently worded) of the focal length (ie: shoot with a 200mm lens, don't go slower than 1/200). Is this rule the same with dslr's, or should I pay more attention to the magnification factor? (I just bought sigma's 18-125mm, but my camera's 1.6 crop crop factor makes that lens behave like 28-200mm.) Should I still be keeping shots near the 1/200 area, or am I probably ok at 1/100th? Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 Take the "magnification factor" into account, i.e. the "rule of thumb" is 1/200s for 125mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmoody Posted September 25, 2004 Author Share Posted September 25, 2004 good point. Hadn't thought of it that way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhi_da_zhong Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 The rule of thumb is based on the field of view of a lens, so yes, you need to take the cropping/magnification factor into account. Similarly, if you know you're going to crop an image by a certain amount, then take that into account, too. Specifically, if the cropping factor is X, the handheld shutter speed needs to be increased by a factor X. But this also depends on how steady you are, so experiment and find your personal minimum shutter speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew robertson Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 With the much smaller mirror on my DSLR (10D) compared to a film SLR, I find that the resultant reduction in vibration allows me to steadily hold the DSLR at slower shutter speeds than with the film camera. On a good day. Sometimes I'm shakier than usual. Why not run some tests? It won't cost a dime with the DSLR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen hazelton Posted September 26, 2004 Share Posted September 26, 2004 In trying slow shutter speed shots in the past, I found that I might have 2 blurry shots and one reasonably sharp one, with the same shutter speed. Assuming the subject is fairly static, you could go ahead and fire off a half-dozen shots or more, and pick the best one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_gillette Posted September 27, 2004 Share Posted September 27, 2004 It's a rule of thumb, not a law of physics. Regardless of whether the camera is a "real" film 35mm slr, a full-frame dslr, a dslr with a crop factor, or a digicam with a mini-sensor, it probably makes sense to run some tests with your equipment, as you use it. I kind of doubt that you'd find (if you had them) that the same body with a 28-105 is going to handle like one with a 100-500, or that all digicams at some equal "equivalent" would handle the same for everybody. Your own test will flesh out the impacts of grip styles, weight and balance, inertia, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now