raymond_cremers Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Hi, Today I bought some new batteries for my Super A. When I got home, I read that the voltage of the SR44 I bought is 1.55V. But the manual says they should be 1.5V. Does the light-meter have a voltage regulator, or is it directly operated from the battery voltage? In other words, does this make a 0.05V difference have an influence on the accuracy of the light meter?Thanks.Best regards, Raymond Cremers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jochen_S Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Although I have such a camera I don't know. I usually go for the 3V lithiums. On the other hand 0.1V is close to nothing and might easily get lost at the contacts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_cremers Posted August 29, 2004 Author Share Posted August 29, 2004 Thanks Jochen, the 3V Lithium you use, is that the CR11108 / CR1/3N? mfG Raymond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_oleson Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Either the CR1/3N or a pair of SR44's should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_williams Posted September 1, 2004 Share Posted September 1, 2004 I haven't noticed any difference in meter accuracy using silver oxide (SR44) or alkaline (LR44) button cells, or the 3v lithium cell - I think they all work fine. The voltage changes with use anyway, and you get a display warning when it's too low. LR44s don't last as long and don't like the cold very much, but I get them for about 10 pence (UK) each, so I mostly use them. If I'm going somewhere cold I treat it to some SR44s. The alkalines seem to last a few months regardless, even if you leave the camera switched on a lot, ditto in my LX. A Nikon FM2 with a dodgy motor drive which doesn't power off the meter was a bit of a culture shock after the Pentaxes - the batteries will go flat in that in under a day if it's left on, so I've taken to carrying spares now. 'course, the SuperA actually *needs* batteries to operate the shutter, while the FM2 & LX don't, but I don't think flat batteries have stopped me taking a single picture in over 20 years with a SuperA. The same definitely can't be said of the MZ5n, which is very well behaved if well-fed but a royal pain when stuck in *cold* *expensive* German towns without spare CR2s - twenty six euros for a pair, mutter, grumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_cremers Posted September 2, 2004 Author Share Posted September 2, 2004 OK, thank you all, I'll just keep on using the SR44 then. Best regards, Ray. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_nicholson3 Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 Carl: For that MZ5n, get the Pentax FG "AA" battery pack. It sells for @20-25 USD and uses four (4) AA batteries. I load mine with the cheapest alkaline batteries I can find. I load fresh batteries @ twice a year (for spring/summer shoots and then for fall/winter holiday shoots). I shoot quite a bit and with the semiannual battery change, I've never had my SLR die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now