jreades Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 <p>I've run across a large number of "high key" portraits on photo.net where the keying was done in Photoshop rather than using actual lighting. For a while, I was actually under the impression that this was solely a photoshop thing, but I now realise that it's just that the result was so different from traditionally well-done keying effects that I didn't realise this was even the same 'technique'.</p> <p>I'd like to thank Maria Dawn for a definition <a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=000N3V">found on photo.net</a>:</p> <ul> <li>High Key <ul> <li>Contains tones ranging from white to 18% grey - Creates a 'light and bright' final image <li>Often conveys a youthful, open, and happy mood. <li>Mostly used to reduce contrast in the model's skin reducing visible blemishes and wrinkles. <li>Good high key photographs maintain edge separation between the subject and the white background. <li>Makes use a front lighting, careful not create a image that is too flat it becomes formless <li>Lighting ratio is usually less than 3:1 </ul> <li>Low Key <ul> <li>Contains tones ranging from 18% grey to black <li>Often conveys a more serious, formal, dignified mood. <li>Mostly used to show the character, or personality of the model by emphasizing shape, texture, and making use of 'mood' lighting <li>Good low key maintains detail in the blackest shadow area. <li>Lighting requires more side and back lighting, to produce large shadow areas. <li>Makes good use of gobos, barn doors, or other light focusing devises. <li>Careful use of fill lights is necessary to maintain low-key mood while filling the shadows just enough to give detail. </ul> </ul> <p>And I can only thank <a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006C1L">Mike Scarpitti</a> for helping me to realise that this technique isn't universally reprehensible (as is <a href="http://www.lafterhall.com/hurrell.html">amply shown here</a>).</p> <p>So my question is this, who can I blame for the abundance of bad portraits where keying was done in Photoshop? Can we please have a tutorial on <i>both</i> the analogue (lighting) and digital (photoshop retouching) versions of this technique (and their relative merits and results) from someone who knows what they are doing? I suck at portraits myself, I just don't want to have to look at all the bad ones in the critique queue without being able to point to a constructive counter-example of <i>good</i> keying.</p> <hr> <p>P.S. I realise the 'kill' might be a bit strong for what this 'inventor' merits, so I'd settle for bludgeoning them repeatedly with a balloon animal and a stack of high-key baby portraits.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike dixon Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 While a few of Hurrell's images are close to "low key," I didn't see any on the linked page that were "high key." His images are high-contrast.<P><a href="http://mikedixonphotography.com/sarahbw04.jpg">This</a> is an example of low key (or close to it). <a href="http://mikedixonphotography.com/sarahybw01.jpg">This</a> is about at close to high key as I've got, and the contrast in it is a little high for a straight-up high key shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshall Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 I'm no expert on this stuff, but I thought that low and high-key meant that there were a preponderance of tones on that side of the scale, but that there would also be at least some amount of tones completing the full range. Thus, high-key would be mostly high tones, but that there would be some near-black tones as well. That's bot a complete definition, to be sure, because that could simply be accomplished with high contrast applied to some images, but perhaps someone can help reconcile the thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basscheffers Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 The problem is this guy probably did some things right as well, so if you were to kill him, those things could get lost too. Everyone's pet peeve about Netscape of the old days, the blink tag, was actualy created by the same guy that gave us cookies and made personalised sites like these possible without having to log in every time you came back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph_wisniewski Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 Marshall is right, a good portrait contains a full tone range. Even a high key portrait has black pupils in the eyes, black eyelashes, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now