tristanlaing Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 I just got a role back of Fuji 100 that I accidentally shot at 400, and had pushed 2 stops. Not suprisingly, the contrast makes almost all of the shots unusable. My question, would similarly overexposing and then pulling colour negative film (I'm thinking of rating 400 at 100, or rating 200 at 50) for very low contrast results, very condusive to bright light shooting? Does anyone have experience with this? I use a pro lab which does not charge extra for pushing and pulling, and uses dip-dunk machines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger krueger Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Yeah, I actually like it a lot. It sounds like you're covered on the lab end, which is the hard part. I've had labs lie about pulling, and one, when confronted said "Oh, everybody knows color print film has two stops of overexposure lattitude"--yeah, but that's not what I asked for, and it's not what you charged me $2.00 extra for $%&hole!! Watch the base density--pulled film will have less base density than normally developed film of the same type. Also, it MUST be a dip- dunk--roller machines can't be sped up much in any event, and less time in the developer means less time everywhere else too. As a bonus, you get cleaner color, smoother gradation and less grain (which were really what made me do it, not contrast--I was shooting 2 over, pull 1). That said, color neg film can hold a lot wider range of contrast than traditional printing can get onto paper, especially machine prints. This might be a case where a good scan would be the right solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_eaton Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Sure....you can pull C-41 film to decrease contrast. Why? Kind of stupid to shoot high contrast, amatuer print film and then pull it when Kodak Portra NC, Fuji Reala and NPS are available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tristanlaing Posted October 19, 2004 Author Share Posted October 19, 2004 I have purchased some portra nc, but what I'm looking for specifically here is ultra low contrast, lower contrast than people would usually want. Not normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 When I shoot Portra 160NC on a sunny day, my wife asks what happened to the shadows. So this could be the textbook definition of "lower contrast than people usually want." Pulling C-41 is usually not done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josphy Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Maybe also try Agfa Portrait 160. Isn't that supposed to be super low contrast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_eaton Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Ahhh.....Tristan is after some unique effects. Hey that's different - pardon my tone. I love experimenting. Hey, pull away. You'll get some color shifting, but nothing dramatic the lab can't compensate for. NPS is the lowest contrast print film on the market, so that might be a good place for starters. Pulling the consumer films might not amount to drastically low contrast such as what I feel you are looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve g Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Why not try pulling an already low-contrast film like something out of the portra line, or fuji nps? That might get you where you wanna go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now