jerry_vincent Posted August 4, 1997 Share Posted August 4, 1997 I regularly see ads for the Koni-Omega cameras at very attractive prices. Are they any good? Which models are best? Which to avoid? THANKS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr._r._e._smith__dr_bob___ Posted August 4, 1997 Share Posted August 4, 1997 In the fall of 1993, a friend and I were photographing landscapes in the Charlottesville VA area. I have always been enthralled with a church in the small community of Cismont, nestled in lovely horse country. It is a beautiful setting but the dickens to photograph. As an experiment, I suggested that we use identical set ups, with his Hasselblad 501C /80mm and I with my Koni-Omega Rapid/90mm. I supplied the film, Kodak PXP, and developed both rolls in my darkroom in fresh D76 1:1, 68.0 deg F., identical agitation. The cameras were set identically both aperture and shutter speed. A Bogen 3046 tripod with a 3047 head was set for eye level (5.5 ft) height. A cable release was used, of course. The only compensation employed was a slight change in distance to compensate for the difference in lens focal length. Both cameras were focused at 25 feet and stopped down to give maximum depth of field. The cameras were tilted slightly upward, which gave a little convergence which I hoped would create a feeling of uplift. <p> The resulting negatives were taped together on a light box window with opaque Strattford board and masking tape to disguise the formats and shown to three local professional photographers. I ask them to identify the image produced by the Hasselblad. After considerable of discussion on acuitance, sharpness, gray gradation, contrast, and other more esoteric qualities, the three agreed on one. You might imagine their surprise when I removed the tape revealing the formats. They had picked the 6x7 negative from the Koni-Omega. <p> What does this prove? Not much, really. Prints from the two negatives can not be differentiated. I used to be sheepish about discussing equipment with owners of more expensive and modern cameras but not any more. For the type of photography I enjoy, landscape, portrait, and still life, I have all the equipment necessary. I don�t do weddings (I can�t handle brides or their mothers), I do few close-ups requiring slr technology, and I am a snob about my work, not the equipment used to get it done. I hear few carpenters argue over who has the best hammer (although I once had to break up a fist fight between two musicians over the best way to carve a clarinet reed - truely). :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_gaasland Posted August 19, 1997 Share Posted August 19, 1997 Dr. Bob, just wondering if you have the Rapid or Rapid M? Is there a difference between the Rapid and Rapid M, and the 100 and 200 models? Thanks, John Gaasland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_liu Posted September 8, 1997 Share Posted September 8, 1997 The "M" and "200" models have removeable magazines (which allows forchanging emulsions in mid-roll), if you can dig up the front part ofthe magazine.<p>I have a small review of the RO 200 on my site at<a href="http://web.mit.edu/mliu/web/medformat/konireview.html">this address</a>.There is also a Koni-Omega mailing list floating about somewhere (Ithink I have the address, but it's buried somewhere at home ...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_lawlor Posted November 12, 1997 Share Posted November 12, 1997 I borrowed a Koni-Omega outfit with 90mm and 58mm lenses to compare with my Pentax 67. The weight was about the same, chromes were excellent with both lenses-like a P67. The Koni was just too funky with all kinds of odd things sticking out. The film advance seemed very unreliable on the one I had. I couldn't make it work with any of the several pro cable releases I tried. You can get the basic camera and lens for $200 to $300. I prefer the P67 (which has its own pecularities) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_montone1 Posted January 28, 1998 Share Posted January 28, 1998 Has anyone, who uses a Koni-Omega, had experiance using the ground glass option with this camera? If so, what is it like? Does it add or detract form its use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy_rhyne Posted March 16, 2002 Share Posted March 16, 2002 What is the difference between a Rapid and a Rapid M? I see both and they seem to take the same lenses. Is their a difference in the backs where one is 120 only and the other is 120/220? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoff_mcauliffe Posted March 18, 2002 Share Posted March 18, 2002 Go to Peter Lanczak's Koni-Omega pages. Full of information! I don't have the url handy, just do a search on his name. The M and the 200 series have interchangable magazines, allows changing film/backs in mid-roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnelstad Posted December 9, 2002 Share Posted December 9, 2002 Here's Peter Lanczak's Koni URL for the sake of completeness: http://www.peterlanczak.de/koni_overview.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now