charles_lipton Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Hi..I'm hoping to break into MF...I am also breaking into digital with the Canon 20D and some L series lenses...I currently own an EOS 3 with a few L and non L lenses...I love film with it's clarity, contrast and colors...I am getting into digital mostly for the convenience of the system... I love the larger negative provided by the MF system...I would use it for both portraiture and outdoor scenics....I like the idea of an interchangeable back... Now, the big question...I can not afford the Hassey H1 although it's supposed to be the cat's ass of 645 MF cameras...I'm looking at the Mamiya 645AF and Contax 645 systems...I've been told the Mamiya lenses are quite good and the Contax lenses, although imprinted with Zeiss, are made in Japan with Japenese components and glass...Probably the same mfr as the Mamiya glass...Given these two cameras...what are the benefits of one over the other or is it 6:1 half dozen to the other? Thanks ...Chuck.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_yeowell Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 "I've been told the Mamiya lenses are quite good and the Contax lenses, although imprinted with Zeiss, are made in Japan with Japenese components and glass...Probably the same mfr as the Mamiya glass" Charles, think again!! Contax glass does not look like Japanese glass at all. Contax is stunning, same as Hasselblad, I use both, often on the same assignment and both in my opinion are better than Mamiya 7 glass which is way better than Mamiya 645. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 The Carl Zeiss lenses for the Contax are made in Germany. The Contax 645 is a terrific camera system but it is not very well supported right now and there have been rumors of it's demise in the near future. The Contax 645 has not been updated in awhile. Yesterday there was a thread here relating to Contax having a new distributor in the USA. There are several companies that make optical glass in japan. More than a few of them make lenses at least as good as Zeiss or Leica do. it is funny that you would worry about a japanese originated lens for the Contax but not about Japanese poured glass for Canon or Mamiya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fast_primes Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 What about the rhighly regarded Pentax 645N/NII camera and it's AF lenses? Do you really need the interchangeble back capability of Contax of Mamiya AF systems? If not, make sure you check Pentax out also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_fleming1 Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Now would be a good time to wait and see how things shake out. If you are not willing to do that then pick up a used Mamiya AF kit which you can sell pretty easily in the future for a 100% return on your money if you buy right. Given Mamiya's recent moves in the MF digital arena it's a solid choice. You may like the Mamiya just fine and decide to keep it. You may decide MF isn't really worth it for you. You may love the format but not the camera and decide to move up later when it shakes out which MF companies are going to remain strong. If you could scratch up the cash you can't go wrong with Hasselblad given their recent developments. Contax is a giant 'Who Knows' right now but the lenses are to die for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre_napier Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I used all three of them on daily basis ( h1, afd and Contax ). They are all good cameras but non of them is perfect. It all depands on your application. If you want to record the reality than Contax is your camera of choice. The lenses are superbly sharp and unforgiving. I use Contax 645 for male portraits . H1 is very fast and with its 1/800 sec. flash synchro is the pro choice for exterior shots with strobes. The lenses however are very expansive and a bit too harsh. I have the 35, 50, 80, and 150 and do not really love any of them. Mamiya has very soft lenses that are greatly applied in female fashion and portreture. I has been said long time ago that Zeiss records reality while Sekor creates it. I had been professionaly shooting for 30 years making a great living by doing what I love to do. If I can give you one advice it would be to get a camera and make pictures. Some of my best images that I display in galeries are made with 1970 Pentacon 6 ( current ebay price - $200 ) Remember each of this cameras is as great as you are. If budget is limited and quality important that get Rz67 - you will love your results. If you want to see my work go to www.MissObiektywu.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hendrik Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Charles, Rent the systems or loan-use if you can, then decide. Every user will have their own likes and diss-likes. No matter how old asystem is, if it's good it's good. If you're just looking at the Mamiya and Contax - and the price is NOT an isue - the Contax (to me) feels right, performs right and is digital ready. The lenses are very good to great and well built. With the adaptor for the Hasselblad Zeiss lenses you can use all the Hassy lenses on the Contax and by doing that also achieve high flash sync through their leaf shutters - if you know what you're doing. The greatest advantage of the Mamiya is price, and that IS always an isue. Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_ing Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Hendrik, How do you use the leaf shutter in Hasselblad lenses when you put them on the Contax 645? I have such an adapter, but see no way to fire the lens' shutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william_yu Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Charles: Just as Andre pointed out, the Mamiya lenses and Contax lenses are of different merits, even though they may be equally of high resolution. Contax's Zeiss lenses are of good contrast, low distortion, and give you a sense that you are looking at the images with your own eyes, not through a lense. Mamiya lenses give much softer images, lower contrast. However, since the whole world is changing into digital, you may think twice or three times before buying into a MF film camera. A whole system (even used) would cost you $10K easily, much more expensive than a 35 mm system. If you like digital, you may later find shooting MF film, (wait for a whole roll to finish if you are not shooting professionally) then have the film developed, scan them, and lastly load them into a computer is much less efficient than a high end 35 mm digital SLR. Those 4000 dpi film scanners in the market are not giving you true scans of 4000 dpi. Maybe 2400 dpi max in reality, due to the lost quality in the extra scanning process. I heard 22 MP digi SLR may rival (barely) the quality of MF film if prints are only up to 20x24. Digital backs for MF cameras are very very expensive. I have the Contax 645 and love it, but also love the convenience of digital. What keeps me from going totally digital is the cost of MF digital backs and doubts about the quality of a less-than-full frame 22 MP sensor. So think it over and, enjoy shooting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andre_napier Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 William. For the past few months I am using Sinar 54M digital back with all of my cameras since this is multi platform back . Previously I use Phase One H20 with Rz/503cw. The quality of the pictures from Sinar back exceeds thouse from a MF scan. I used to scan my work on $25,000 Eversmart scanner. I had 1ds mark II for 3 weeks and hated the results. You can not compare them to MF digital back. Some people do not see the diffrence, yet to some people pixel is a pixel. Sinar back is only $15K for 22mp and with ISO 25 I printed posters 40x60 and they look as good as from 8x10 chromes. I am as obsesed with quality as any of you can be. Digital is here to stay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now