friedemann_pistorius Posted February 1, 2004 Share Posted February 1, 2004 Hi folks, I do mostly landscapes, and besides my 90mm I need another lens on the wide side of life, so I decided it must be a 65mm lens. I also considered a Schneider SA XL 58, but I like the slightly warmer colours of Japanese glasses more. Since I hike a lot, weight is also a concern, so I narrowed my choice down to the Nikkor SW 65 and Fujinon SW 65. Both are almost similar in their coverage, and I know the differences in lens design and weight from the specs tables, which I found on Kerry Thalmann's impressive site (thank you Kerry - great job!)Now, can anybody who uses one (ore both) of these lenses express his or her experiences - is there a reason why I should prefer one over the other?Any comment will be greatly appreciated - thanks in advance! Greetings, Friedemann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_candland1 Posted February 3, 2004 Share Posted February 3, 2004 The Nikon is F/4 (the fastest of all 65mm lenses) compared to F/5.6 for the Fuji. At that wide a focal length that could make a difference. I don't use either so hopefully someone who does will chime in. Good luck, Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk Posted February 4, 2004 Share Posted February 4, 2004 Hello, I have never used or even seen the Nikon, but I'm sure it's a winner and the f4 could be useful. I have a new 65mm SWD Fujinon and it's fabulous. My net pics http://www.photo.net/photo/1975580 , http:// www.photo.net/photo/1710820 and http:// www.photo.net/photo/1704254 were taken with it. I've had it 10 months and I just love reaching into my bag for it. Using a 65mm is not without it issues though as I'm just learning. It's likely that the Nikon has exactly the same features and I imagine that wider lenses have the same. I don't think I'll buy a wider lens. I was told that for landscape work that my lens wouldn't need a centre filter and largely that's true. However, on a few frames I notice falloff a little more. Don't know if it's lighting or subject tone. It isn't excessive and I've handled it comfortably with photoshop and in the darkroom. Front rise quickly causes the film image to be damaged. Not a big problem, but you need to be more aware of it than longer lenses. I often use a 6x12 back and there is no rise problem with this. I use a Lee filter system and one of my filter holders has the ring for the polariser on it. This can cut the corners with rise too, I very rarely use a darkcloth and the f5.6 is a joy in this respect. I'm using an Ebony 45SU with it's bright screen. Prior to this wonderful camera I had a Linhof Technika V with Beattie screen with which I not only had to use a darkcloth on all but the brightest days, it was a real pig to use with the 65mm. After first buying a sunken panel, then an extended panel placed on the back rail and then finally machining a Linhof special front panel with bellows, I gave up and bought the Ebony where the lens controls stay right at the front of a flat panel. Borrow a 65mm or a 58mm to ensure that the lens is useable with your camera. regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friedemann_pistorius Posted February 10, 2004 Author Share Posted February 10, 2004 Ed & Gary, thanks for your comments, both very helpful! Gary, which fresnel do you have on your Ebony, when you use the 65mm lens - the regular or the wide angle fresnel? Thanks, Friedemann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk Posted February 21, 2004 Share Posted February 21, 2004 Hi, I only have the standard screen supplied with the camera when new (Feb,. 2003). Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now