henry_minsky1 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 I was thinking, since the Canon digital sensor uses a color filter over the pixels, what if the color filter were on a layer that could slide, and a piezoelectric element shifted the filter one pixel up and then one pixel over, taking three images in rapid succession, then you would have three times the resolution, i.e., a real RGB for each pixel like the foveon gets. The trick would be clearing the sensor data quickly enough to take the different pictures fast enough to get a decent equivalent shutter speed. Or is the mechanical shutter too slow for this? I wonder what the speed bottleneck is, the mechanical shutter or the electronics to reset the pixel sensor elements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedding-photography-denver Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Wow, what a fun and light hearted subject. Why would this be of use since the Foeveon is already doing true RGB? Could you not just increse the physical size of that sensor? Regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_hively Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Maybe the next 1Ds mark 2 will be the first three sensor camera? http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1606046,00.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_ferguson1 Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 Canon patented this a couple of years ago, it was recently pointed out on another web site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omeryair Posted June 11, 2004 Share Posted June 11, 2004 This idea is partialy used by some medium format digital backs: the sensor reads the data, then shifts half a pixel and records more data. This doubles the sensors outpus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron c sunshine coast,qld,a Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 In practice you can't get three times the resolution because the current interpolation used with bayer sensors is really quite good.<BR>Notice the bayer sensor isn't in practice three times better per megapixel-it's only about 50%(?) depending on who you ask Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 Maybe you should look at some of NASA's interpolation algorithms for larger pixel monochrome (or multiple exposure multi filter) capture that allow sub pixel size resolution to be extracted from images. The trick to apparently exceeding Nyquist limits is having some knowledge of what is being imaged. The basic idea is that if pixel A shows red, and pixel B a shade of purple, while pixel C shows blue, then you can estimate a sharp boundary position between red and blue within the width of pixel B according to the shade of purple. You can't really use these techniques with a Bayer sensor though - where pixel B could be green and show no response to either blue or red, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now