gcoates Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I'm looking at buying a copyright stamp for use on the back of my prints. I've seen statements on some vendor sites that say the copyright stamp must include the year in order to "protect" the copyright adequately. However, I thought that the stamp isn't needed to protect the copyright at all in a legal sense. If this is true, then the copyright stamp on the back would just be a deterrent to the people who might try to copy the prints and a notice to any photo labs that the photos are professionally done. I know that a couple of attorneys frequent this forum. Do any of you have input in this matter? Does the year need to be included on my copyright stamp, or is this just a marketing tactic by the stamp companies so that I will buy a new one each year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelging Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on Television. I did talk to a Lawyer years ago who told me that all you have to put on the back of a print is Copywrite and the R in a Circle. This show that you have the intent to copywrite, and that is all you need. I am sure someone will have a different opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_gillette Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 It might be worth checking the Library f Congress site. They have plenty of detail on the markings, etc. You may have to go past the first few FAQ type pages and get to the various publications or more in depth material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photoattorney Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 The copyright notice had to be affixed work published prior to March 1, 1989, or it immediately lost copyright protection. (Copyright protection has been restored for some foreign works even if they were published without notice before 1989.) That law has been changed; work published after 1989 does not need a copyright notice to maintain its copyright protection. It is, however, a good idea to use a copyright notice when displayed or offered in any manner. <br /><br />According to copyright law, the proper copyright "notice" has three parts: the first part is the letter "c" in a circle (the letter "r" in a circle is for a trademark registered with the U.S. Trademark Office, not for a copyright), the word "Copyright," or its abbreviation, "Copr." Some people use a "c" within parentheses like this: ©, but it has not been designated to be part of the official copyright notice. The second part notes the year when the work was first published (not taken). The third required part of a copyright notice is the name of the copyright owner. The final form looks like this: Copyright 2007 Carolyn E. Wright. <br /><br /> When you use the copyright notice it may stop someone from stealing your photographs, either because it serves as a reminder that the work is protected or because the notice interferes with the use of the work when it is part of the photo. Also, it helps to post a copyright notice on your photos because the infringer then cannot say the use was innocent. You also may be entitled to damages under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act if the proper notice is removed prior to infringment. You may use the copyright notice without registering your work with the U.S. Copyright Office. <br /><br /> Best, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_johnson21 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Good information Carolyn. I just want to add my 2 cents. In order to bring a copyright infringement lawsuit against someone, the copyright must be registered with the copyright office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gcoates Posted March 9, 2007 Author Share Posted March 9, 2007 Thanks, Carolyn! I was hoping you'd chime in on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jana w. Posted March 12, 2007 Share Posted March 12, 2007 I don't know if you are looking for a source for the ink because regular ink won't work. I use a stamp as well for my prints. I bought a kit from B&H for proof stamping but I didn't like the stamp it came with. So I went to my local office supply store and had a custom stamp made (no ink pad so I can use with the B&H kit) with my business name copyright and phone #. It only cost $8 and it saves me a bundle in unlawful duplication! Also, I saw another photograper use customized stickers, they kind of looked like grocery tag stickers. I think they could be too easly pulled off! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now