Jump to content

VJs to eventually succeed PJs?


._._z

Recommended Posts

Still-frame technology is already good enough for many print editions, not to

mention video's usefulness and current integration with web news. Considering

the added value of video to content providers and the cutbacks by news

organizations, is the future of photojournalism image slices shot by

videographers/videojournalists?

 

http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002765131

 

http://digitalcontentproducer.com/hdhdv/depth/photo_finish_2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tricky topic. A Video guy is a bit different from a photographer.

 

Most of the News camera guys I have met don't approach things as photographer would.

 

They just want 15 seconds up close 15 seconds wide and they are gone.

A photojournalist waits for that on moment even if that moment is on the video I doubt it will beat what a skilled photographer would have captured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael - You must be a Gannett Guy. As another Gannett-er from the Asbury Park Press said to me last month at the NPPA short course - "the bus has already left the building" when referring to video. It's not really something of the future, it's something of the present. I was surprised to hear that the video work the Asbury paper is doing was actually used as pool video for t.v. and not just for an affiliate station. Pretty much everyone I know in my area who is a still news photographer is either beginning or already working with video as well. The area's largest paper has published some frame grabs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...