joshwand Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 <p><a href="http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6453-6821">Sports Illustrated's digital workflow</a> <p>A great description of SI's digital workflow, as used during Super Bowl XXXVIII. In-camera, editing, transmission, prepress, you name it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_hawkins Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 Highly cool. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormfront Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 Very interesting, thanks for the link Josh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted March 21, 2004 Share Posted March 21, 2004 Who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshall Posted March 21, 2004 Share Posted March 21, 2004 Actually, I found it entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cd thacker Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Me too. Educational, as well. Very interesting to be a fly on the wall inside SI's photo operation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walter_strong3 Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Great link, Josh. Who cares? People interested in photography I guess!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msitaraman Posted March 22, 2004 Share Posted March 22, 2004 Very interesting read, Josh! Thankyouthankyou. If you don't mind, I'm going to bring it to the attention of a couple of the other forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugh_t Posted March 25, 2004 Share Posted March 25, 2004 It would have been interesting had they been using Kodachrome. Its the only real tool for imaging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beauh44 Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 <I>It would have been interesting had they been using Kodachrome. Its the only real tool for imaging.</i><BR><BR> But then it wouldn't be digital workflow, would it? I would've found it more interesting had it been the <I>Swimsuit Issue's</i> Digital Workflow. Rhetorical Question: Do many digital enthusiasts troll the film forums to trash the film guys? If not, why not? Discuss . . . ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormfront Posted April 11, 2004 Share Posted April 11, 2004 I find it hilarious that what Sports Illustrated does is not real imaging because they don't use Kodachrome. I'll bet SI are really bummed that they are just amateurs. I mean all those issues they produce are quite shocking, aren't they? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now