tim_miller Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 Hello:I need to scan many archieved 2.1/4" SQ. NEGATIVES and a thousand2INCH 35MM SLIDES. I am not up to date on the latest machines to scan both 35 MM and 2 1/4" NEGATIVES OR POSITIVES. I would liketo hear from folks who have used scanners in these formats. I would like to make CD- DVDs to archive this material. I would appreiate helpful information. Thank you.~Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthuryeo Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 You did not tell us how much you want to spend or do you intend to rent just for this project? And, what quality of scan you have in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbing Posted April 15, 2006 Share Posted April 15, 2006 I have the Microtek i900 which has film holders for 4 120 format frames (645, 6x6, 6x7, 6x9), for 12 35mm slides and for 12 35mm negative strips (It also has film holders for 4x5 and a glass holder for all other transparency and negatives up to 8x10). It will do prints of any size as well. The scanner comes with Silverfast Ai 6 software bundled with the printer as well as the 4x5 and print calibration targets. I had been looking for a MF scanner for sometime but I could never afford one but the Microtek was around $500. An amazing price for the quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klix Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Hello: NIKON SUPER COOLSCAN 9000 ED $1800. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_drew4 Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 How much is your time worth vs. outsourcing this task to a service provider?? Are you JUST archiving? Why? You aleady own terrific backups of your images. (. . .I'm just being a contrarian . . .) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troyammons Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Wait on the new Epson V750 pro scanner then make your decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photography by a.f. smith Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Those are both great scanners. If you're a bit more price concious (like me) look into the canon 8400F. It does a surprisingly good job with medium format, and a passable job with 35. Refurb models (What I got) can be had for $125. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattb1 Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 If you are going to go the inexpensive route microtek is a quality company with quality products. However, you do get what you pay for. Stay away from any Epson product, the only thing they are good at is making marketing promises they can't fulfill. The amount of post processing needed to get an acceptable print is more than excessive. Definitely not the tool to be doing a lot of work, especially archiving. If you can afford it, the Nikon 9000. It will save you a lot of time and frustration and get you prints you will appreciate. By the way, an external hard drive may be a better archiving media than DVDs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now