._._z Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 http://snipurl.com/4r0k Pro Photographer Conversion to Digital Photography Creates New Opportunities, According to New InfoTrends Report NORWELL, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 26, 2004--InfoTrends Research Group's latest study of pro photographers shows that 79% of professional photographers are already using a digital camera. Of those that do not yet use a digital camera, nearly half plan to purchase a digital camera in 2004. Complete immersion in digital photography occurs over time for pro photographers, because going digital requires a substantial investment in digital imaging equipment. While many pro photographers are using digital cameras, many are still in an early stage of a transition to digital photography. "Our survey results show that most pro photographers have started using digital cameras, and that the longer they use digital, the more they integrate digital photography into their businesses/studios," says Michelle Slaughter, Director of Digital Photography Trends at InfoTrends Research Group. "We see a significant amount of business opportunity in this segment of the market, not only for manufacturers of digital cameras, but also for those that offer printing solutions, storage solutions, and services for marketing photos via the Internet and managing photo assets. We expect 2004 to be a strong year for sales of professional digital photographic equipment." InfoTrends' new survey report entitled 2004 Professional Photographer Survey is available immediately. It is based on a survey of 1,000 professional photographers in the United States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_wade Posted February 26, 2004 Share Posted February 26, 2004 Incredible.<br>Photo.netters are always so quick to cry, <b><i>� Copyright Violation !!!!�</b></i> when their web-posted bytes are re-posted on other sites.<p>Yet, Photo.Netters <i>(like the originator of this thread</i>) have no qualms about violating (U.S.) copyright statutes when �cut-and-pasting� clearly defined protected content to other sites�. like this one. Go to the Business Wire web site (or follow link provided be the original poster) and read the copyright notice. The fact that that the original poster in this thread is hiding behind a non-de plume should heighten the awareness level of the moderators of this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliot_n Posted February 27, 2004 Share Posted February 27, 2004 C'mon - it's a press release, sent to thousands of media outlets... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted February 27, 2004 Author Share Posted February 27, 2004 Not only is it a press release, but it is a slectionf from the press release, which David would have noticed had he bothered to look. But it's more fun for him to rant, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donald_choi Posted February 29, 2004 Share Posted February 29, 2004 David, This is a press release, which is widely available to the public. The fact that the original poster did NOT modify or relay the information in such a way that the original intent of the press release is altered means that he has adhered to and respected all laws and ethics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now