._._z Posted July 11, 2004 Share Posted July 11, 2004 PRESS RELEASE: NPPA Board Adopts New "Modernized" Code Of Ethics ST. PETERSBURG, FL (July 10, 2004) The Board of Directors of the National Press Photographers Association, Inc., today unanimously adopted an updated Code of Ethics for the organization and its members during the final day of their meeting at The Poynter Institute for Media Studies in St. Petersburg, FL. The new Code of Ethics came before the Board as a resolution requiring a vote, which was unanimous. John Long, of The Hartford Courant, chair of the Ethics and Standards Committee for the NPPA, requested during the Board meeting last year in Chicago their approval to expand the committee in order to modernize and revamp the Code of Ethics "from the ground up." "We need committee members who represent professional ethics and all aspects of photojournalism that exist now that didn't exist in 1946 (when NPPA was founded), such as editing and television," Long told the Board in 2003. "The committee's goal is to craft a Code of Ethics that is applicable to everyone and is inclusive of all aspects of photojournalism." Appointed to the committee at Long's request were Deni Elliot, Paul (Lester) Elliot, Sean D. Elliot of The Day, and J. Ross Baughman of The Washington Times. Al Tompkins and Ken Irby of Poynter advised the committee. Here is the NPPA's new Code of Ethics: Preamble The National Press Photographers Association, a professional society that promotes the highest standards in photojournalism, acknowledges concern for every person's need both to be fully informed about public events and to be recognized as part of the world in which we live. Photojournalists operate as trustees of the public. Our primary role is to report visually on the significant events and varied viewpoints in our common world. Our primary goal is the faithful and comprehensive depiction of the subject at hand. As photojournalists, we have the responsibility to document society and to preserve its history through images. Photographic and video images can reveal great truths, expose wrongdoing and neglect, inspire hope and understanding and connect people around the globe through the language of visual understanding. Photographs can also cause great harm if they are callously intrusive or are manipulated. This code is intended to promote the highest quality in all forms of photojournalism and to strengthen public confidence in the profession. It is also meant to serve as an educational tool both for those who practice and for those who appreciate photojournalism. To that end, The National Press Photographers Association sets forth the following Code of Ethics: Code of Ethics Photojournalists and those who manage visual news productions are accountable for upholding the following standards: 1) Be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects. 2) Resist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities. 3) Be complete and provide context when photographing or recording subjects. Avoid stereotyping individuals and groups. Recognize and work to avoid presenting one's own biases in the work. 4) Treat all subjects with respect and dignity. Give special consideration to vulnerable subjects and compassion to victims of crime or tragedy. Intrude on private moments of grief only when the public has an overriding and justifiable need to see. 5) While photographing subjects do not intentionally contribute to, alter, or seek to alter or influence events. 6) Editing should maintain the integrity of the photographic images' content and context. Do not manipulate images or add or alter sound in any way that can mislead viewers or misrepresent subjects. 7) Do not pay sources or subjects or reward them materially for information or participation. 8) Do not accept gifts, favors, or compensation from those who might seek to influence coverage. 9) Do not intentionally sabotage the efforts of other journalists. Ideally, photojournalists should: 1) Strive to ensure that the public's business is conducted in public. Defend the rights of access for all journalists. 2) Think proactively, as a student of psychology, sociology, politics and art to develop a unique vision and presentation. Work with a voracious appetite for current events and contemporary visual media. 3) Strive for total and unrestricted access to subjects, recommend alternatives to shallow or rushed opportunities, seek a diversity of viewpoints, and work to show unpopular or unnoticed points of view. 4) Avoid political, civic and business involvements or other employment that compromise or give the appearance of compromising one's own journalistic independence. 5) Strive to be unobtrusive and humble in dealing with subjects. 6) Respect the integrity of the photographic moment. 7) Strive by example and influence to maintain the spirit and high standards expressed in this code. When confronted with situations in which the proper action is not clear, seek the counsel of those who exhibit the highest standards of the profession. Photojournalists should continuously study their craft and the ethics that guide it. © 2004 The National Press Photographers Association, Inc. 3200 Croasdaile Drive, Suite 306, Durham, NC, 27705 +1.919.383.7246 www.nppa.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericwarnke Posted July 12, 2004 Share Posted July 12, 2004 It looks quite straight forward and reasonable, but I think a photojournalist might have some trouble not occasionaly. Specifically 7 where sometimes a release may be necessary, why should reasonable and non-discriminatory compensation be given to subjects. If someone could post the old code it might be useful to compare and contrast against this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melissa_eiselein Posted July 13, 2004 Share Posted July 13, 2004 Those standards may be a little more difficult for television news media, but they are all common practice at the print publication where I work. We even had to sign a statement saying we would seek permission from the company before we sought any supplementary income--even jobs that had nothing to do with writing or photographing or news. Thinking of moonlighting as a dishwasher? Working weekends in the local mom and pop hardware store? Considering an internet business? First, we've got to ask the company for their blessing. While it seems like an invasion of my private time, I understand the reasoning behind it. It's all about ethics and making sure that we never, ever give the appearance of impropriety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now