briandykes Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 I have signed up for the insurance offered through photo.net and was wondering if anyone else has done so. And if so, share your thoughts on the process? I talked with 2 people at HRH and were both were very friendly and seemed to be excited about the responses they have gotten. I did some serious searching for weeks trying to find insurance and this offer could not have come at a better time. I hope I never have to file a claim, but that being said, I feel better that I am now insured for my equipment. Thanks photo.net and HRH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 I don't think photo.net offers insurance - you simply responded to an ad served by their advertising partners, I suspect. However, HRH seem to be a large broker with nationwide US coverage, so hopefully you have the cover you need at a competitive price and if the worst comes to the worst your claims handling will go smoothly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briandykes Posted July 27, 2007 Author Share Posted July 27, 2007 Look under your "Subscriber services" box on your workspace page, it is in association with photo.net. There is a PDF file explaining it all there. "LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PHOTO.NET" with the Photo.net logo right on top. This is also discussed here: http://www.photo.net/learn/insurance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 Mark is technically correct. We (and by that I mean photo.net) do not offer insurance ourselves. What we have done is partnered with an insurance company to give our subscribers access to a policy at cvery good rates. While I haven't called them to get an exact quote, judging by their information I would save $4-500 a year from what I am paying now for gear and liability coverage. Also, as a quick note, do NOT use a rider/floater on your homeowners policy to cover your caerma gear. It is a horrible idea. If the company decides that you have too many losses, they can cancel your whole homeowners policy. Not just the rider/floater. It happened to be a few years back and I had to pay 3x my previous homeowners rate through a 2nd tier company for 4 years. No 1st tier company will insure you if you have recently had a policy canceled. Thank you very little State Farm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akajohndoe Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 The "mysterious disappearance" exclusion of the HRH coverage could be a big problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 All insurance policies seem to have some version of that. I think they are trying to ward against fraud. But I encourage everyone to talk to the people there and learn exactly what is and isn't covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasey wilson Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 Wow, thanks Josh for that tidbit about the homeowner's insurance. My gear and my computer are covered through State Farm, no less! :( KW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlatling Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 I used to have State Farm Insurance too. A good Colorado Company -- humh! I fired them. It gives one a sence of power to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lburk1 Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 This may appear as a dumb question but here it is anyhow. What is the necessity of liability insurance for a photographer? I have dealt with liability insurance during my career in the plumbing-HVAC trades for obvious reasons. But I don't see too much liability exposure in photography. Please enlighten me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted July 27, 2007 Share Posted July 27, 2007 What happens if you goof up a mafia wedding?:); or the brides dad is a an ex-sniper?:); or if the bride knows a zillion folks? A leak in a house can be fixed; lost wedding images cannot be recreated by magic; unless you are from Hogwarts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lburk1 Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 So what you are saying is it is not really a property liability policy, but a product liability or performance bond policy? (BTW There is no such thing as an ex-sniper) ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akajohndoe Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Generally a police report trumps any mysterious disappearance clause, but still, it is best to talk with the agency and read the policy to be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarshall Posted July 28, 2007 Share Posted July 28, 2007 Lavern -- You don't just need product liability coverage. You need a general liability policy for the same reason ANY business needs liability coverage: in case you cause injury to someone or in case you cause damage to someone else's property. If you aren't shooting for any business reason, then you probably don't need ANY insurance, except to cover your equipment. But if you are getting paid to do photography, you need a GL policy in case a kid gets hurt in your studio, if you knock over a piece of valuable art at a client's premises, if your lights start a fire at a wedding reception, if the venue where you're providing a service requires that you have a certain amount of liability insurance to even be working there ... all of these are reasons that if you have a photography business, you should have insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now