jon_kobeck1 Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Any thoughts on which would be better for weddings and events? Im liking the XE1 with the zoom kit lens (price). Is it worth stepping up to the XP1? Also, I was planning on getting the new X100S but is it going to redundant when paired with an XE1 or XP1 and fast prime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andylynn Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 <p>I'm starting to really appreciate that zoom lens. To my eye (and various reviews) it's competitive with the better 17-50/17-55 f/2.8 zooms for crop sensor DSLRs. The primes are also really good. The 35mm f/1.4 is as good as most German rangefinder primes.</p> <p>I do think if this is for pro wedding work you'd have some gaps with the Fuji system, like a good tele zoom and a really good flash system, and the Fujis aren't as quick as the higher spec DSLRs, but if you're trying to supplement a system you already have with something small a Fuji might be a good choice.</p> <p>As for which body, it's a bit of a tossup I think. With the X-Pro1 you have a larger body, better rear LCD and that hybrid finder. The X-E1 is smaller, has a lower res (still not bad by any means) screen and no optical finder but the EVF is better, with higher resolution, more eye relief (it's very comfortable with glasses) and adjustable diopter. I don't really like the optical finder and I do like the kit zoom, so I went with the X-E1 kit.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslie_cheung Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 <blockquote> <p>Also, I was planning on getting the new X100S but is it going to redundant when paired with an XE1 or XP1 and fast prime?</p> </blockquote> <p>Wouldn't you want more than one camera for wedding/event work? Redundancy is good here.</p> <blockquote> <h2> </h2> </blockquote> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parv Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Dupe: http://www.photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00bNcB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ted_raper1 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 <p>I have the X-E1, and as great as it is for static photographs (which is what I use it for), I'm not sure it would be my choice for wedding/event work, unless it's as a backup. For us old guys who grew up using rangefinders, its user interface is absolutely great - use it once or twice and it becomes second nature. So that part is good - but it's not the quickest at autofocus, and even with the 35 1.4 (I have that and the zoom) it struggles a bit in lower light. I love the camera, and though I have tried many different ones these last few years (Nex 6, micro 4/3, Panasonic, Oly EPs) this one I'm keeping. The combination of modern technology and old school UI is just what I want - throw in outstanding IQ, and I'm sold. I sold my Nikon D300s and the 2.8 zooms I was using to get the Fuji (I also have the wide angle zoom, and the good flash, so I'm into it for $3,000).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_loader Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 <p>Not sure if it's worth getting the X-Pro1 over the X-E1 unless you really need the OVF. IQ is the same. The money saved could get you an extra lens - the 60mm maybe? Have a look at Zack Arias's blog where he gives a real-world review of the X100s. Short version ; AWESOME...and yes, he's used it at weddings. You may also want to look up English wedding photographer Kevin Mullins who's reportage style is done with an X-Pro1.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now