Jump to content

Fuji GSW690III


charlie_strack

Recommended Posts

Does anyone use a Fuji 6x9 RF camera & care to share their opinions?

 

<p>

 

I'm considering getting one as a "small" (by LF comparison) portable camera with a decent negative size, without spending the small fortune required for one of the other models that have interchangeable lenses, and not so much portability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I've owned a GSWIII for two years now, and love it. I use it

predominantly for my colour work, but have also put a hundred or more

rolls of B&W through it, with great results. The Fujinon EBC lens is

stunning, even wide open, and I never hesitate to have the sun in the

image, if necessary, knowing the quality of the lens will win out.

Highly recomended - light, convienent and sharp as a tack.

 

<p>

 

Eric Boutilier-Brown

http://www.evolvingbeauty.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use both the 65mm and the 90mm versions of this camera and like them

quite a bit. There's a lot on them in the medium-format archived

threads on photo.net (under "Fuji rangefinders") and one guy even

started a website, www.fujirangefinders.com.

 

<p>

 

The shortcomings are well-known: non-interchangeable lenses, no meter,

not a convenient "B" or "T" setting. But compared to LF, they're a

breeze to use, especially in driving rain or blowing snow. A few

thoughts:

 

<p>

 

Marked hyperfocal distances, as with most MF rangefinders, are a stop

or two optimistic.

 

<p>

 

Lenses are not as sharp as Mamiya 7 lenses; see Chris Perez's site, I

think, for a comparison. They're "very good" lenses, but I don't think

they're "great."

 

<p>

 

Film flatness has been raised as a problem for the 6x9 versions of

this camera; I haven't noticed it, but my photos with the Fujis do not

seem to be quite as sharp overall as those with the Mamiya 7, a camera

which combines the sharpest MF lenses with good film-flattening

design.

 

<p>

 

Many people are buying both the Fujis and the Mamiya 7's at

www.robertwhite.co.uk and saving a bundle.

 

<p>

 

........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlie:

 

<p>

 

I use a Fuji 6x9 with the 65mm lens and a 6x7 with a 90mm lens. The

cameras are solid and produce nice sharp negatives. I use the 6x7 as a

general purpose camera and the 6x9 primarily for landscapes.

 

<p>

 

I would echo the limitations mentioned above, particularly with

respect to timed exposures which are inconvenient. I would also add

that the Fuji's are not very useful at close distances (under about

3ft) and that the rangefinder view is slightly obscured by the camera

lens. You will also have to adapt to focusing a rangefinder unless you

have previous experience with these types of cameras. If you buy a

used version, inquire about the number of rolls shot with the camera.

On my model, there is a mechanical meter on the bottom which advances

with every roll shot. I hope this helps.

 

<p>

 

...................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlie -

 

<p>

 

I have a GW690II, which has the 90mm lens. That's a really nice

focal length for general snapshooting on 6x9. The construction is

VERY plasticky, but sturdy enough overall. It's a nuisance to use

mounted on a tripod, both because rangefinder viewing isn't ideal for

framing carefully and because the "T" setting for exposures beyond 1

second is a nuisance to use.

 

<p>

 

I don't much care for the lens. It's more than sharp enough. I've

never had a film flatness or focus alignment problem at the medium-to-

small apertures I've used with this camera, though I've heard from

another user that shooting at f/3.5 can be a little iffy. The

contrast and tonality are a little on the hard and unsubtle side for

me. The out-of-focus character is smooth and nice for backgrounds at

close range, but when the backgrounds fall off to infinity with the

point of focus at midrange the OOF backgrounds have a sort of mealy

look that I find intensely obnoxious, especially in B&W. I rarely

use the Fuji any more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On EBAY you can get a 1980's Mamiya Universal and a gaggle of very

nice interchangeable lenses for about the same $. Just a thought.

It's what I've done for color jobs, and have been very happy with.

The system offered 6X7 and 6X9 removeable backs which are well known

for their film plane flatness (and I suppose sometimes light leaks if

you aren't nice about how you torque the longish door.) J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi charlie

i have these cameras and the earlier versions w/interchangeable lenses

for close to 20 years. i currently only use type 1 and a type 11 with

the 90mm lens. if possible it is best to buy the camera new and from a

local source so you can compare the lens sharpness of a few different

cameras-they do vary. i have had some cameras where the the lens was

best at f5.6 and others where f11 was optimum. also,as i think ellis

mentioned you must check the rangefinders on these cameras and do so

every year if you use it a lot. they do go out of alignment easily

compared to a leica. lastly.i often blow up my images to 30"x40" and

they are very very sharp.

the mamiya 7 is a fine camera except i did not like the viewfinder

much;lots of distortion in comparison the the fuji. also,i think the

mamiya lens are quite a bit more contrasty therby appearing to be more

sharp....however i do not think this is the actual case. thay are

however very good.i can only say i have run about 5-8000 rolls thru

the fuji's and i love them. they are a wonderful camera and now with a

tk23 i have some lens choices in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlie,

I've owned a mint condition GSW690III for a few years now and

have found it to be great. The lens is very sharp and the camera

light for its frame size. Having said that, I'm about to either sell it

or trade it in on a secondhand panoramic camera. It has shot

only about 35 rolls and is in tip top condition, so anyone

interested is welcome to contact me (Australia) for a better deal

than new through any store. All round a simple, portable, sharp,

convenient camera. I agree with another posting suggesting the

hyperfocal markings are just a tad optomistic - perhaps by one

aperture stop. There's just no substitute for front tilt! Why sell it?

I'd just like a pano camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I am amazed that anyone would spend $1000+USD for a

rangefinder - without a meter - and you cannot change lenses -

totally amazing......

So just what do you get for your $1000-1500 that you can't find in an

old used 6x9? Judging by the posts above, there is not exactly a

consensus (sp) regarding the lens.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the last posting, you get a very modern, sharp,

contrasty lens in a body that is sturdy, requires minimal setup

time and has a viewfinder with accurate focus assist. Requiring

an external lightmeter shouldn't pose a problem to LF users.

The camera can be used not only for landscape but also in a

photojournalism style for, say, environmental portraits, shot

handheld with ease. Also easily used without a darkcloth in

sight. An ideal solution for travel photography without all the

other LF paraphernalia we love to use but have to schlep around.

In summary a lot of neg area with minimum fuss, a brilliant lens

(search past threads, and the MF forums on photo.net, there are

many devotees of this camera) and portability. Think of it as half

a Fuji GX617 at a quarter the price - with similar excellent quality.

Damn, I might have just talked myself into keeping it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Fuji 6x9 with the 65mm and one with the 90mm. I also have

the 6x7 with the 90mm. I love these cameras. The lenses are very,

very sharp, the images that I make in 8x10 are almost identical to my

4x5 images. I have a few 11x14 prints that also look great. The

cameras are well made, and I've been very happy with them. The draw

backs are few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have owned tis camera for 5 or 6 years and always loved it. I haven't shot it

in a while, and want to sell it to purchase (surprise) some digital equipment.

Does anyone have any advice as to where I might get the maximum return on

this camera? I know this isn't a classified forum, and I apologize if this post is

inappropriate, but I am new to selling equipment. Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...