Jump to content

Best way to mount inkjet prints?


Recommended Posts

What is the best way to mount inkjet prints? I use mounting tissue

and a heated press for mounting conventional photographic prints

(color and blaok & white) to an acid-free mount board. Will the

heat cause premature damage to inkjet inks and media? Is it better

to use a mounting spray like the 3M? What's the most archival

solution (recognizing that most inkjet prints themselves are not

really archival).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inkjet prints I frame always have an inch or more of border on all four sides. As such, I simply use archival corners to hold the print in place on an archival matte board:

 

 

http://www.lightimpressionsdirect.com/servlet/OnlineShopping?Dsp=20300&PCR=30000:220000:221000:221100

 

 

Then, I over-matte and frame. Since I'm printing on sheets of heavy 100% rag matte (e.g. Ilford Galerie Fine Art Matte) paper, I haven't had any problems with prints curling or buckling after framing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, I don't think any method where the entire photograph (or other work of art on paper) is glued down to a backer board is truly "archival." Archival standards require that the mounting process be fully reverseable, and as far as I know it is pretty hard to reverse the dry-mounting or spray-mounting process. The MOST archival solution is probably to use hanging tabs made of Japanese paper glued with rice starch glue. For details get your hands on a copy of the book "Curatorial Care of Works of Art on Paper." Whether these lengths are necessary for your photographs is a seperate issue of course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using my Seal drymount press to mount inkjet prints, made on my 1280. Some are as much as 5 years old and seem fine. My "real" photographs are made in my darkroom on fiber paper, processed in the traditional archival fashion, washed for an hour in a proper washer, selenium toned, and drymounted on the best acid free board I can buy and will doubtless outlast me.

 

Your last sentence is probably the most important. I do not doubt that prints made with the newer Epson and HP pigment based inks will last a long time. As with all these questions, what matters is the definition of a long time and who will want to look at them. Actually, as I think about it, it may be more important to have long lived digital prints than those from traditional negatives given the improbability of there being ways to store the original digital files "archivally."

 

If I can find a negative, I can still print it (at least as long as there are either traditional materials or a proper scanner available). The future of digital files is less certain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric Friedemann has it right...

 

I'd never drymount any print that I cared about. UNLESS, the print is so large that archival

mounting to a backing board with corners will not provide adequate support. Then I'd cold

press with archival materials.

www.citysnaps.net
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting sidelight to this is that for years, Kodak recommended dry mounting for archival materials. The theory being the dry mount tissue is neutral, and isolates the print from any impurities in the mount board. Don't know if they still do, or even care.

 

Reversable is the standard for museums.

 

Bill Pearce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff, another angle to consider. I first went the archival hinge mounting routine with a good amount of overmat, and while it was more archivally accepted, the client wants a great looking print today, as well as tommorow. It may be fine printing some 12x18's and hinge mounting them in Arizona, but here in humidity-laden New England, you'll definately notice some curling and buckling eventually. I've been doing the art show circuit for 5 years, and now own my own gallery, and after seeing customers (not photographers) reactions and comments, I'm firmly convinced of keeping that print perfectly flat. It just doesn't sell once it starts to wave. I've been printing and drymounting with my Epson2200 and now Epson 4000, and a Seal drymount press for three or four years now, and the prints look just as good as the new ones off the press today. I frame using all acid free materials and UV glass to help ensure longevity. Maybe they lose a tad (some debate) in longevity, but they'll look better throughout the owners lifetime. And heck, if they want to change the mat or frame, they still can, just not the acid free backing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David brings up a good point. Let the print dry AT LEAST a day first. It's less prone to scratching or marring when you're trying to get that small bit of dust off it before framing it. Also even more important is the out-gassing that still occurs. In humid conditions, I've had prints that I've drymounted and framed after drying for a day, and later the inside of the glass became fogged from the continuos out-gassing. I now wait a minimum of three days, with paper on top of the print to help speed the process, before drymounting and framing, and preferably a week if I can.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...