steven_fong1 Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 Can anyone please give me an idea of this lens' performance, wide open and stop down? How does it compare with the legendary 90 Elmarit? Ant distortion? I like the size of it, not larger than a 35/2. Good for hiking. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 Steven It is a good lens all around. A little low contrast at f2-2.5, but fine by 2.8. It is useable at full aperture for portraits, but not really for infinity shots. It is an excellent lens and a bargain. I don't think that ants are particularly distorted when taken by this lens, and I have not noticed distortion otherwise - not that I take precise architectural type shots. You might think twice about taking shots at f2, but the increased brightness for focussing makes the lens very nice to use. Above f2.8 I can't really tell it apart from the Elmarit. Actually, I prefer the Summicron to the Elmarit in terms of ease of use on the camera. Even better is the 80mm Summilux, but that is another story. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david11 Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 When I used the Leica R system, I owned the 90 Summicron and 90 Elmarit lenses. Both are fine performers, although the Elmarit is more highly regarded. I first purchased the Elmarit, but required an f2 lens. I used the Summicron more often than the Elmarit; the additional stop gives greater focusing accuracy with the SLR. The Elmarit is probably the "better" lens, but most of the time I used the Summicron. FWIW, Now I shoot Leica M mostly and use a 90 Summicron ASPH. Rumor has it that the 90 ASPH Summicron will be available shortly in an R mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_l_ck Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 David, there will be an apo-summicron 2/90 asph at photokina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_. Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 I also owned both the 90/2-R and 90/2.8-R version II, sold the latter. As with the equivalent M lenses, from f/2.8 they are virtually indistinguishable; however unlike the M lenses the R lenses are very close in volume and with the R's coarse, grainy screens the finder brightness advantage is important for me. Whether there will be a 90 APO-R soon or not, the price of that lens will certainly be at least 3-4 times that of a used 90/2, unlike the M where the 90/2 late E55 pre-APO sells for about 2/3 the cost of the APO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 Right, any new R APO Summicron will cost at at least $1400 or more. If Leica are really foolish they might even make it on a par in price with the APO-Macro Elmarit in which case it will be more expensive still. Nowadays you can pick up a nice 90mm Summicron-R for 300-500. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremyt__ Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 I have been using this lens for about one year now, and am very happy with its performance. I've even blown prints up to 24x36, and they hold up really well. I am, however, selling my R system and if you are interested in purchasing this lens, please let me know. Hopefully we could work out a deal! -jeremyT; jerthomas@hotmail.com; www.lifeinblue.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F. Posted July 1, 2002 Share Posted July 1, 2002 Brian Bower, in his Leica Lens Book, says that the 90 Summicron is better than the 90 Elmarit. I reserved comment until I could see what others had to say. I have the 90 Summicron-R, and the 90 Elmarit (1st version) for the M. I'd say the Elmarit takes the cake, but this is mixing apples and oranges, because the formulas are not the same (I don't think) between the rangefinder and reflex versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xavier_dalfort Posted July 2, 2002 Share Posted July 2, 2002 I have not been able to compare both Elmarit and Summicron, I just bought a Summicron 90/f2 Canadian since it comes as good bargain these days. One thing nice is the Elpro 3 you can add, giving a good result. The results are very nice and the lens is not that heavy. For most of the photography I'm doing, it's enough!Cheers. X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted July 2, 2002 Share Posted July 2, 2002 Rob Brian B does say this and this is contrary to all reports and experience of many. But the first version Elmarit-R has a fine reputation too, I agree, and I wager produces a beautiful image. The main thing counting against it is its large size compared to the Summicron and the later Elmarit. In my experience most of the Leica lenses produced in the 1960s have a wonderful look - M and R. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david k. Posted July 4, 2002 Share Posted July 4, 2002 I have used both the Elmarit-R and the Summicron, and find the later to be less contrasty, and generally not as crisp as the Elmarit-R. The Elmarit also balances better on a R4 thru R7 body. Having said that the Summicron seems to be a nice fit for a R8 body. My choice was the Elmarit-R, and I am extremely happy with the lens, - one of the best medium telephoto lenses by any manufacturer, at by Leica standards, a bargain price. The Summicron is preffered by some portrait users, but as an all round lens the Elmarit-R is hard to beat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now