warren_williams Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>I have been doing amateur architectural photography with a Shen Hao using a 90mm and the bag bellows. Most of the time I am only using the camera's rise to achieve what I need. I am wondering if there is a 6x9 equivalent that would be lighter and/or smaller that would do the same thing. Briefly I need to mount a 58-65mm lens and get 24-30 mm rise at infinity on either the 6 or 9 dimension. I don't think either a Horseman VH or a Linhof Technika can do this in terms of functional wide angle rise. I know the more expensive 6x9 monorails can but I don't think I'm saving weight. The 23 ebony is a possibility but rather expensive. the 19p or 612p horsemen might be a possibility. I think all the Silvestri's are going to be almost as heavy as my 4x5 set up. Any other ideas? </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vick_vickery Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>I'd just get a roll film back and a 65mm lens...it'll do all you need to do and you can avoid the cost of a new camera. Of course, new cameras are fun to get...! :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>TK 23S or the older TK23</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_a._york Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p><a href="http://www.largeformatphotography.info/roundup2x3.html">http://www.largeformatphotography.info/roundup2x3.html</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>The problem with the post Peter refers to is that it is out of date. For instance:<br> "</p> <ul> <li><strong>Technikardan 69</strong> Telescoping monorail with an unique mechanical design allow the camera to be collapsed instantly to book-size. Folds the smallest for a monorail. High german quality feeling. Better in the field (excellent portability) than in the studio (particular to operate and not modular). extension: 48-340mm . 2.8kg ($2900)</li> </ul> <p>This camera was replaced several years ago by the TK23S</p> <ul> <li><strong>Linhof M679</strong>: designed with the digital studio in mind, it and comes out of the box with no means of viewing or using film. Geared swings and tilts, but no shift or rises on the original model (It has been replaced by the <strong>M679cc</strong> which has rear rise and shift, $3300) Integrated ball head (comparable to a Profi III), which makes the weight look more reasonable. 3.8kg.</li> </ul> <p>The M679cc was replaced several years ago with the M679cs with front and rear shifts and rise and a geared leveling head.<br> At the 2008 Photokina Linhof introduced the Techno hybrid 23 view camera made from aluminum and carbon fiber view camera for field work. It uses lenses as short as the 23mm Digaron on a flat board! (the 23 Schneider will require a deep recessed board however). The Techno is just now arriving for sale to dealers.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicaglow Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>Smaller, yes. Lighter? I'm not so sure. The ones I crave (besides the Linhof) are the Arca Swiss, and Sinar P3. There is also a Toyo VX23D. Personally, I think the roll film insert is the way to go (at least for me). I have both a 6x7 and 6x9, but I'd sure like to have the Sinar multi-format foll film holder.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kparratt Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>The Technikardan 23 / 23S is designed for the facility you need. Complete with the case, it is the perfect solution. They are very simple to set up from the moment you arrive at the location.</p> <p><a href="http://linhof.de/index-e.html"><strong>Linhof</strong> </a></p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_blatner Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 <p>Other possible suggestions are the <a href="http://www.fotomancamera.com/product_list.asp?id=343">Fotoman 69S</a> (although it may not have enough rise) and the <a href="http://www.shen-hao.com/TFC69Aen.html">ShenHao TFC69-A</a>.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_sokoloff2 Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 <p>From what I've seen, 6 X 9 cameras that handle modern wide angle lenses with movements tend to be expensive. I'm probably going to switch to 4 X 5 for this very reason. That new ShenHao that Alessandro mentioned looks really interesting. I wonder what it costs?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 <p>"From what I've seen, 6 X 9 cameras that handle modern wide angle lenses with movements tend to be expensive. I'm probably going to switch to 4 X 5 for this very reason."<br> And 45 cameras that can handle modern extreme wide angle lenses, 23mm, 28mm, 35mm are also expensive. And much larger and heavier if you only need 6x9cm.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
felix_ackermann Posted November 28, 2009 Share Posted November 28, 2009 <p>just a few remarks from practice...<br> I would strongly advise against a dedicated wide angle camera - except you're in the position that it is irrelevant how much money you spend. You could be annoyingly limited. Part of my living is photography - architecture and objects. And very often the specific needs also in the field of architecture require normal to long lenses!<br> I might be a nostalgic and very attached to my camera - but for my needs with often difficult situations my Sinar Norma meets all my requests. I use a wide range of lenses, from the Schneider Super Angulon 47 mm XL up to the Apo Ronar 600 mm. My main format is 6x9 mm.<br> If I would just carry around the camera with 1-2 wide angles, without the Sinar shutter, lens shade, one magazine, light meter it would indeed be a 'lightweight' solution.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allen_whittier Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 <p>Have you considered a light weight 4x5 that closes down to your short focal length and has a large enough lens board to offset the lens up most of the rise you normally use? It looks like Wista might work. They have a bag bellows for wide angle. Toyo 45a and 45ax close down to 45mm with a recessed lens board. SK Grimes could probably make a custom recessed lens board with rise. Since you mainly do architectural photography a recessed lens board would probably work well. There are probably other cameras with short wide angle capabilities that would work with an off set lens board.<br> Another possibility is having your 6x9 film holder modified to offset 1/2-3/4 inch to reduce the need for so much rise. I would look to SK Grimes for this too. If you have a camera with a removable back, a custom back with fall might also be possible.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_salomon Posted November 29, 2009 Share Posted November 29, 2009 <p>" It looks like Wista might work. They have a bag bellows for wide angle"<br> Not all Wista field cameras accept a wide angle bellows. All metal and some wood Wistas do accept one.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_g Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 <p>cambo wide ds ?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kparratt Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 <p>The smaller the format, the more critically precise must be the engineering, the machining, the tolerances.<br> Wood can not match metal in this respect.<br> If you are concerned about weight, I would also suggest Arca Swiss Discovery 4x5, and get a good roll film back as suggested above. Sell the Shen Hao thing, because you will become absolutely married to the quality of the Arca Swiss, and you will still have the choice of formats, medium and large.<br> <strong>If</strong> I were only ever going to work with 6x9 /6x7, I would sell everything and still go for the Technikardan 23 S, in a heartbeat, and get on with it. Beautiful for studio and on the move. Second to none.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now