Jump to content

smallest and lightest wide angle lens for 8x10


ric_yama3

Recommended Posts

I am looking for the smallest and lightest wide angle lens (150 -

240mm) for 8x10. I don't need any movement of the camera as long

as it barely cover 8x10. About the f stop, f8 is good enough. I don't

need multi coating or any fancy stuff, so I don't mind if it's 50 years

old but lightweight and small size.

Give me advice which one to get.

Thanks in advance

ric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

210 G-Claron. Covers nicely at f22 and coverage "grows" as you stop down further. They are tiny and in Copal 1. First time I EVER heard a 135 WF Ektar would come close to 810! That would be spectacular. Does it go seriously mushy out past the stated circle. If shutter is un-important, the 209 JML is fabulous as is Konica Hexanon GR II and Rodenstock Gerogon. Even the little Repromaster 210 will cover but gets softer in the corners sooner than the others.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to put a vote in for the 159mm f/12.5 Wollensak Extreme Wide Angle. At 1.2 inches thick and 2.8 inches in diameter in its Rapax shutter and weighing in at 230 grams, it has to be among the smallest. The 135 WF Ektar is through at 5x7, but the 195 WF Ektar will just do it, but in a much larger shutter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

159mm 12.5 Wollensak - tiny little lens, very nice. Also the Kowa Graphic 210mm f9 (you might need to get a Copal 1 shutter for it) - smaller and imo nicer than the 210 G-Claron (more coverage for one thing). Both lenses small and relatively cheap.

 

Tried a 190mm WF Ektar - didn't like it - massive and no much coverage. I'm always looking for a 180mm f9 Carl Zeiss Dagor though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another vote for the WOLLY (Wollensak) 159mm!!! I am amazed that this little and inexpensive lens produces so well!! To tell the truth, I don't use all that much, BUT, everytime I mount it on the camera, I have a big grin ;-)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ric,

 

No one mentioned a 6 1/2 WA Dagor. They are compact and good. Try and get one with a serial number of 77xxxx and above. If you come across a 210 Angulon it will cover fine (angulon, not super, though they can be pricey). The 9 1/2 Dagors are also really great, although it is at the narrow end of your spectrum. I was touting the 180 Zeiss Dagor WA to Tim, though you don't see a lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...