Jump to content

P.P. Challenge 26 October 2018; I got this one GC.


Recommended Posts

OK, Bill. It looks like just you and me. All work done in PSE15: (1) straightened horizon, (2) adjusted tonalities using levels, (3) selectively increased saturation in area in front of fence using sponge tool, (4) selectively desaturated area behind fence, (5) sharpened using slider.

 

 

fullsizeoutput_2aba_edited-1.thumb.jpg.41f54facfbfbbd67fec35795eb8c41f8.jpg

Edited by michaellinder
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=full]1269025[/ATTACH]

 

I was playing around with this image using warping, cloning, cutting and pasting, etc., and this is what I ended up with. Exact steps would be irreproducible.

 

Glenn,

Very creative! It also gives new meaning to when people go down to the harbor to see the tall ships come in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WK_Edit10272018.thumb.jpg.32097aa02431866030bd98d297799d3e.jpg

I am late to the party but Michael thanks for supplying the image.

I used Gimp. I strained the horizon and cloned out some vegetation in the lower left coiner and some object in the upper right coiner. I also cloned out one of the cars in the middle ground. I added some contrast and did some sharping. For some reason the color of the green area down by the tracks didn't look right so I desecrated it,

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely done Mike you show that expensive software options are not the only way to go..........regards GC.

Thanks Gerald. When I bought my camera about 2 years ago I started using Gimp because it was free. The learning curve was petty steep but I have developed a good consistent workflow I like and I get good results with. I have never used anything so I don't know what I am missing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but a negative response, should we maybe more inclusive and be encouraging more people to have a go.;)

What I meant by my comment is that it shouldn’t matter whether more expensive or less expensive software is used for post processing. What matters to me is the quality and expressiveness of the post processing work relative to the photo.

 

I certainly did not mean it as a discouragement.

 

What I like about Mile’s take on the photo is that it doesn’t scream software, cheap or expensive. It simply uses software in a refined way to help the photo look like what he wanted it to.

  • Like 1
There’s always something new under the sun.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...