John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p lang="en-GB">I acquired the Fed in a mixed auction lot a few months ago. Although it was extremely dirty it's ever ready case had kept it in undamaged condition, even with its original lens cap. After a lot of cleaning, coaxing, a little oil here and there, and exercise, I managed to get it all working pretty well. I even managed to dismantle the lens, which was cloudy, and clean and re lubricate it.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p lang="en-GB">I hadn’t realised that so many Leica copies were made in the USSR, even before the war. I think this one is a Fed 1D, dating from around 1940. Its a very close copy of a Leica 2 down to the same range of shutter speeds. It has a collapsible Fed 50mm F3.5 lens, similar to the Elmar. It's very well made, not at all a cheap copy, I’ve got a Leica 3 and the build quality is comparable.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p lang="en-GB">I only show a few shots from the Fuji 200ISO print film I put through it. A lot of them were done in very dull conditions to test the rangefinder etc.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p lang="en-GB">The little presumably uncoated Tessar type lens is excellent, except when there are bright areas in the frame when you get flare, an occupational hazard of uncoated lenses. I couldn’t find a hood to fit it.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p lang="en-GB">You have to trim the film leader to load it, Leica style. The viewfinder gives you a very rough idea of what the camera is pointing at. An auxiliary finder might be better. The rangefinder is nice and bright and seems accurate.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Another one</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Another by the canal locks</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>The inevitable graffiti</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>With 200ISO Fuji print film, the settings were 1/60 or 1/100 at around f11 in hazy sunshine - it has an old range of aperture stops, F3.5, 4.5. 6.3, 9, 12.5 and 18. It took a bit of mental arithmetic to translate the exposure meter readings.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Forgot the picture.</p> <p lang="en-GB">All in all it was an interesting exercise in restoring and using a Leica type camera.</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Last one, thanks for looking.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck_foreman1 Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 Very nice job with an old lens. I don't bother translating the math for the f stops. ( I wouldn't know how actually ) They are what you think they should be is my approach. I think you did really well I often get some flare that others refer to it as "glow" Your results are quite respectable. I certainly don'T know the many different Fed models, though I recognize the exteriors as copy Leica II. I will want to look up how they differentiate themselves. Is the rangefinder design copied from the Leica? It seems quite robust. Thanks for sharing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris-bochenek Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Good job with this beauty. I like the colors in your shots - very nice. All I can make out from the inscription is USSR Harkovsky Kombinat- years of Russian studies went to hell. Thank you for sharing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey_rogacion Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>I think the pics are nice and very natural, considering it's age. The rangefinder glow differentiate it to an slr...............the restoration was worht it, like to see more ........thanks for sharing</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Thanks for the comments. Chuck, when I said mental arithmetic perhaps I was exaggerating, I mean just guessing the nearest aperture stop from my Polaris digital meter which has a 1/60 setting, but not 1/100. Kris, the colours are nice and muted but it was that sort of a hazy day. I did spend some time looking at different websites (there are quite a few for USSR cameras) to identify it as a 1D.</p> <p>Grey, yes it is remarkable that a camera which is nearly three quarters of a century old still works smoothly and does exactly what it was made to do, credit to the designers, whether Leica or Fed, and the people who made it.</p> <p>Here's a couple more:</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Last one, really:</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolas_renon Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>A restored FED 1 can be a very efficient camera, as efficient as a Leica II or III. The only trouble I see with pre-war cameras is the find a matching lens or not to forget to shime the camera according to the lens. Of course, when you get a camera + lens combo, you can assume they match well but it is better to check as there is no indication you get the original lens...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>I'm a little worried by the NKVD (earlier version of KGB) markings, however. Could the Ukrainian jokesters now be ...? ? ?, well..</p> <p>In any case, nice work with it. Reminds me I need to do a cleaning job on the lens of my otherwise mint Gold and Rosewood Swedish Army "Leica" ;)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>JDM, from Camerapaedia:</p> <p>"The <a title="FED" href="http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/FED">FED</a> camera was introduced in 1934 by factory of the Dzerzhinsky Commune in Kharkov, Ukraine, former USSR. <strong>FED</strong> are the initials for F.E. Dzerzhinsky, the founder of the <strong>NKVD</strong>, in honor of him the camera was named."</p> <p>I'm pretty sure its genuine, it had obviously not been out of its clearly original case for many years when I acquired it.</p> <p> </p><div></div> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_robison3 Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Thanks for sharing. I've often wondered about these early FSU cameras. It is so refreshing to work with a simple camera with only three direct controls to consider when in use. Sometimes, in bright light at small apertures and moderate to long distances you don't even have to worry about focus, just leave it at infinity. Color negative film provides reasonable latitude I see. I'd like to shoot color but there is just no local walk-in C-41 processing anymore, the nearest is a 51 mile round trip.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Gammill Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 Nice shots and very sharp. Thanks for an informative post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>I know about the NKVD connection to the commune, but were the early FEDs actually so marked?<br> Just asking.</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolas_renon Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Marking looks genuine to me and consistent with the serial number.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_drawbridge Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>Nice tidy-up of an interesting early Fed. Sharp little lens, though I guess the lack of coatings tend to reduce the saturation and contrast, producing the central hot-spot evident in many of the images. Great pics, notwithstanding; you're fortunate in having so much photogenic infrastructure on hand, <strong>John</strong>. Thanks for another fascinating post.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted September 7, 2014 Author Share Posted September 7, 2014 <p>JDM have a look here, it shows the engraving on the Fed 1D, including the NKVD bit.</p> <p>http://ussrphoto.com/wiki/default.asp?WikiCatID=98&ParentID=1&ContentID=962</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now