Jump to content

Zeiss Tessar or Schneider Xenar 150mm 3.5 ?


art_major

Recommended Posts

<blockquote>

<p>I just dug up to old lenses, which one should I keep?</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Depends on what they were buried in and how bad of shape they're in. :D<br>

Seriously, ask them. Mount them up on lens boards and make some test shots. How well they were stored and how roughly they were handled will have more to do with how they preform now than they did when new. </p>

<p>If both are in very good condition I'd bet on the Zeiss.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Depends too on if they are similar ages i.e. both produced close to WWII and uncoated. Coating is likely to make a larger difference than anything else, if the lenses are in good condition expect usual 4-element performance with reasonable central sharpness at full aperture improving somewhat 2 or 3 stops down, with edges not great at full aperture but improving to good by f11 to 16.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>What Charles said: test before deciding.</p>

<p>Anecdote: I have a couple of uncoated Zeiss Tessars from the 1930s. I bought them 25 years ago, but I don't use them anymore. One (a 10.5cm) is sharp, and performs close to a modern lens. The other (a 13cm) gives a very soft image. From the outside, there's no visible difference in their condition.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...