Jump to content

A Minister Most Rare


Recommended Posts

<p>I posted a few details of the camera when it arrived. <br /><br />http://www.photo.net/classic-cameras-forum/00YyoR<br /><br />There seems to be very little information out there on the Minister 700, though there's plenty to be found on the Minister D, which appears to be identical apart from the lens. Produced in 1964, I can only assume it was intended to be an up-market version of the "D", but it's strange that so little survives in the way of comments, critiques or advertisments. Anyway, the Ministers are well-built and very hefty for their size; they have good bright viewfinders with moving parallax-correcting brightlines and clear rangefinder images, Copal SVL shutters with speeds from 1 to 1/500th of a second plus "B", and a somewhat annoying cross-coupled aperture and shutter speed system which is set by rotating a ring marked in Light Values, in accordance with the reading displayed by the uncoupled CDS meter. I find it cumbersome, and I never found the LV scale to be of great benefit, anyway.</p><div>00ZBTN-389389584.jpg.8018695e5b784152d20a9d013fa2f507.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The film wind and cocking is by the top-mounted lever, with a reasonably short throw, and the rewind is conventional with a release button on the baseplate. The meter is activated by depressing a button on the rear of the top deck, adjacent to the viewfinder, the circuit being powered by a 625A battery. The lens is the difference between the two cameras, with the 45mm 4-element f/2.8 lens of the Minister D being replaced by a 45mm 6-element f/1.7 lens in the 700. And a very fine lens it is, too. While I can't swear on a bible, I'm fairly certain it's a more generic Tomioka production, and not essentially "Yashinon", since I have a Ansco, a Taron and a possibly a Ricoh which have lenses which appear to be identical. It has a distinctive curved front element, and an unusual clarity, and it takes very fine pictures.</p><div>00ZBTP-389389784.jpg.79645f1b954a87a6f017b70640d65352.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>That's a lovely camera, Rick! More intriguing is the f/1.7 lens on it; I don't know of any other older Yashicas that had f/1.7s on them as f/1.8 always seemed to be the norm for fast lenses from that time. Beautiful pictures, of course, with "Chairs" being my favorite. Those old Yashicas are such a pleasure to use. Thanks for posting and sharing.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Nice-looking camera, the usual stunning Drawbridge camera porn, and some very nice photos as well (4, 6, and 8 being my favorites). Interesting use of the cover of a Creedence Clearwater Revival album for your camera background.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi, Rick Thanks for posting some more of your usual great photos, and for reminding me of my mis-spent youth via a Yashica Minister. Mine (back in 1966) was the more ubitiquous 'D' model with the F2.8 Yashinon, but one of my fellow RN pals had a similar Minister 700 to your recent acquisition. The f1.7 aspect may also have had something to do with the later Electro-35 Yashica, that one with the flashing idiot lights and insatiable appetite for expensive batteries, but produced excellent results.</p>

<p> I always have fond memories of the Minister, because it was my first 'serious' camera. However, within less than a year the EV ring was proving a nuisance and I got rid of it. Changing settings from low light (say EV4) to bright light (say EV19) was an especially tedious job, requiring much yanking with the wrists. Several times I missed out on a candid shot because of the yanking factor, so it was a case of 'No, Minister' (groan!). (Pete In Perth)</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucy You .. I like want another wrote regarding your presentation photo vs your working photos. I too enjoyed the CCR cover and liked Stormy sky. Struck on that photo of the wide angle performance for a more proper "normal" lens. All the other photos were great with "chairs", "path" and first frost remaining in memory. These "Biotar" lenses do have a different look, than the Tessar type and lucky you to have such a unique camera/lens combination
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Quite right, Subbarayan. Although Cosina did produce some interchangeable lens RF cameras under the Voigtlander and Rollei names as well as its own, these were a bit pricey for many. I would like to see the revival of a fixed lens RF with mechanical operation, perhaps only needing a battery for the light meter. However, unless Cosina can buy the tooling from the manufacturer of a fixed lens RF, they would be starting from scratch and R&D might make the cost nearly as great as the interchangeable lens RF. For a while, though, I recall seeing new Seagull RF (205 or something like that) that had f2.8 lenses and leaf shutters, but no meter. All the great ones, Konica Auto S2, S1.6, S3 etc, as well as various Minolta Hi-Matics, Yashicas, Olympus RC and other Olympus, Canonets, Fujicas, Ricohs, and others that I haven't named, all went out of production when the manufacturer decided that sales were not sufficient to continue production. Now in 120 Fuji does have a multiformat 120 RF, but it is very expensive. <br />Sorry Rick, if I hijacked your post a bit.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The Yashica Guy : <a href="http://www.yashica-guy.com/document/chrono2.html">http://www.yashica-guy.com/document/chrono2.html</a><br>

has an article on Yashica rangefinders, which says of the Minister(IV) Model D "A small number of these cameras were produced under the marque, <strong>Minister <br />700</strong> with an ƒ 1.7 lens. The only 700's that I have ever seen on offer <br />were in the UK."</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Thanks for your responses. It's always fun when one comes across an unusual camera, especially when it's of such a common marque. Thanks for the compliments <strong>Ed</strong>, <strong>Chuck</strong> and <strong>Craig</strong>; I think I enjoy photographing these old cameras as much as I enjoy using them. I know you're a Minolta fan from way back, <strong>Andy</strong>, and I'm pleased you enjoyed the post. Don't worry about adding interesting detail to the thread, <strong>Mike</strong>; that's really what the Forum's all about.</p>

<p>Thanks for your reminiscences and the bad pun, <strong>Pete</strong>, and your usual thoughtful contributions, <strong>SP</strong> and <strong>JDM</strong>. The move is under way, <strong>Tony</strong>, but now we're delayed by snow, of all things...That reference from the Yashica Guy is one of the very few I found, <strong>John</strong>; isn't that a great site?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...