ilkka Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 <p>Doesn't have to be full frame. Half frame would be enough. Other manufacturers have been making them for years. But not yet in a tough weatherproof body with a zoom lens.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruce_rubenstein Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 <blockquote> <p>A full frame in a "tough" S95 sized package would have me glad to see ya.</p> </blockquote> <p>And put you in an alternate universe where the laws of physics were different.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 The Canon D10 can be shot RAW with CHDK, but my friend says it's not helpful because the JPEG is so good. Here's a bunch of shots he took, mostly shutter priority. Pretty amazing I would say, considering the splashing and speed of the river. http://cacreeks.com/whipface.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_markanich Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 <p>Bruce, are you referring to the setback necessary between the lens and sensor? Stranger seemingly impossible optical dilemmas have been overcome.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregcoad Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 <p>The S95 has so many strong points beyond capability to shoot RAW. Noise, as has been pointed out, is a pointless discussion unless it includes intended output. I have printed a very nice 11x14 at ISO800. Also depends on how picky you want to get too. At f/2.0 at ISO800 you can do quite a bit. Brave enough to go to 1250 and the possiblities expand even more. The point is, low light is really one of this cameras strong suits.</p> <p>The other biggest strong suit is that the shooting experience is almost seemless when I set down my 1Ds and pick up the S95. Wish I could select autofocus points manually and de-couple the AF and metering on the S95 like I can with my 1Ds (or most other SLRs). But aside from that its pretty much the same control set. I really love using the "C" mode on the dial so that if my wife has been using the S95 in green square, I can quickly return to my favourite set up by just flipping the dial.</p> <p>The control over the flash is also something I really love on the S95. Yeah, its tiny and weak, but in a pinch it can get things done in certain circumstances and having a little control over it is something I really appreciate about this camera.</p> <p>Weak points, (there aren't many) would be battery life, which is to be expected from a tiny camera with a tiny battery and the lack of focus point selection as mentioned. Just make sure you have a few spares in your pocket. </p> <p>I am hoping one day Canon releases an S95 with a fixed 50mm f/1.4, but I know that will never happen.</p> <p>Other than that, I absolutely love the S95. I rank it up there with one of the best purchases I have made in terms of camera gear.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter kjaer Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 <p>Upgrades seem to be in the pipeline:<br> http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/06/powershot-info/<br> Anyway, i just spent 10 days in St Petersburg, Russia, with an S90 I had bought second hand 2 weeks previously. I have been very satisfied with that particular compromize between size/quality. I shoot RAW and use the live histogram all the time. It is true what they say that the ring around the 'joystick' on the back moves too freely, so I assigned iso to the ring around the lens and haven't had trouble with involuntary iso shift.<br> Beware, the lens is NOT corner sharp at 2.0, you need to stop down at least one stop. I know, not 2 lenses are exactly the same, but mine performs best at 4.0, so I keep it there whenever possible. So, for evening shooting there may be better options. The new Olympus seems to have a spectacular lens, but may have other shortcomings. I think perhaps the LX5 is also a better camera /lens, but too expensive (and large) for me.<br> And of course the S90 will blow highlights if you are not careful. That goes for all cameras this size. Shoot raw and watch the histogram.<br> Having no grip, you need both hands to hold the camera. I made a grip from this clay you can harden in the oven, works well. But I always use both hands anyway.<br> I will move up to M43s or the new Nikon micro system if that turns out to be good. I want som better dynamic range. But I will keep that S90 to have with me ALWAYS. It is not perfect, but the best compromize for me.<br> Oh yes, get 2 extra batteries, they are cheap and don´t need to be Canon made.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frederick_stevens2 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 <p>The S95 is certainly a very nice vest pocket camera and ideal for opportunistic work and can always be available. I would like to take RAW/JPEG pix but the manual has defeated me. Anyone know how to persuade the S95 to do RAW/JPEG?<br> I followed the instructions but they don't seem to work!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted July 6, 2011 Share Posted July 6, 2011 <p>Shooting RAW or RAW+JPEG requires you be in P, Av, Tv, or M modes. <br> <a href="http://canoncanada.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/21745/~/shooting-raw-images-(powershot-s95)">http://canoncanada.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/21745/~/shooting-raw-images-(powershot-s95)</a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now