Jump to content

Whats the best 35mm SLR?


jonjel

Recommended Posts

Keith,

 

There�s nothing wrong with searching for the best price online and visiting a brick and mortar store to actually see & feel the product. Tell me you�ve never done that before, that�s right because you can�t. It�s hard taking the advice of some kid behind the counter. And if I�m fortunate enough to get someone my own age helping me the good old �Nikon is the best� rant gets old. My advice is to feel each camera in his own hands and decide for him self. He knows who the major players are Minolta, Nikon, & Cannon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Contax is a terrible camera. so are Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Minolta, Olympus and

Minox. The only camera you should buy for yourself is Leica. Go to the Leica Forum

and ask them which is the best Leica and they'll be happy to help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, seems to be a few evil little people out there LOL.

Well, since you're asking which is the best SLR I would assume you're beginner. Also you looked at Contaxs - a wealthy beginner! The most important thing for a SLR is not its features but the sytem as a whole. A camera with all the latest bits and bobs won't do you no good if you can only find one lens made for it. In light of this I would say go with Canon if you want the latest shiny toys or Pentax for their old mechanical K-mount cameras if you want quality for less money.

I've got both and am pleased with both. The Canon usually goes with me when I need the autofocus and for taking quick pictures while I'm running about. The Pentax on the other hand goes with me when I need a camera to take pictures like landscapes and other stationary stuff. I actually have a Pentax 67II for most stationary stuff but the Pentax is a nice backup.

Best thing to do is actually try various cameras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manuel,

 

Assumption is the mother of all *&^%-ups. How do you know that Angelo knows the three major players in slr camera production? Like I said, we need more information from Angelo to answer this question.

 

"There�s nothing wrong with searching for the best price online and visiting a brick and mortar store to actually see & feel the product." - I think you are wrong, and please, assume what my reasons are.

 

"Tell me you�ve never done that before, that�s right because you can�t." - I have never done that before. When I go into a camera shop, not a local drug store that happens to sell some point and shoots or the Target electronics section, but shops that cater to enthusiasts and carry real gear. I talk to the employees about photographic equipment and subjects. They are usually helpful and very schooled in the gear that they are selling. It helps when I have informed questions. When I feel they have gone the extra mile and performed a service for me, I give them my business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on where you are, there should be decent camera shops. If a camera store sells lots of high end equipment, the odds are that they have knowledgeable people. If there is a small price difference between a camera store and online, buy local. If you have to pay an extra hundred dollars for a $4500 camera, that isn't much considering. It is always better to suppport local stores than support the Walmarts of the world.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ Yes, Keith. But some stores will also push whatever camera or lens that they are getting the greatest kickback for on that particular day/week/month.

 

It's not to say that b&m stores are dishonest, but a raw rookie who knows nothing about photography and the inside dealings of these stores is *not necissarily* going to be steered in the right direction for whatever needs or type of photography that they are interested in. There are salesmen who will steer them to whatever product will pad their commission check the greatest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My, what a bunch of opinionated a**holes most of us are!

 

Smart*ss responses aside, there are a lot of very good cameras, and almost any camera is perfectly fine for most purposes. Without more information from Angelo, the answers simply cannot be definitive, and can only be trusted a little bit. Some knowledgeable people have already given advice that would be right for some people and horribly wrong for others.

 

Angelo, if you're even looking at this at this point, read the "what camera should I buy" stuff, do a little research, and come back with *specific* questions, please.

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Though out of production now for many years the Pentax MX was

the smallest, lightest, full function manual SLR in the world.

Versitle and hard working. I bought my first MX in 1979 and only

this last year had it in for service. It's light meter having worn out.

(To insure aginst future troubles of this kind I've bought a couple

of donar bodies for parts.)

 

For the present day I'm leaning toward the Pentax *ist cameras.

The 35mm body has just been voted best SLR by the TIPA. I'm

also hearing great things about iit's digital brother the 6.3mp

*ist-D. One great thing about these cameras is that their lenses

are interchangable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...
<p>Want a new 35mm slr camera then the Nikon F100 is your best bet. It handles almost all of Nikon's lenses including AI-S manual lenses. Has matrix metering for auto focus lenses and can shoot up to 4.5 frames per second. It is still available brand new at B & H PHOTO at only 750.00 dollars. I bought one myself and it works great. It is made in Japan which is a big plus. This camera will last a lifetime !</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...