lancemcvay Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 I've been experimenting with pinhole body caps on my Canon 20D and I have a couple of questions I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on. <p> I've been having the most success with the Loreo Lens In A Cap variable-aperture pinhole cap. It's adjustable in steps from f/5.6 to f/64. Often, when I take a picture at f/64, I get a sort of fog-looking brightness in the picture. I assume that this is just from more light hitting that area of the sensor, but am I correct in this thinking? I would think that the brighter/fogged area would be more centered than it is. <a href="http://sacredartichoke.com/images/pinhole/IMG_9026-01.jpg"target="new">Here is an example of what I am talking about - note the fog over the second bridge support</a> (one second exposure f/64 ISO 100 ). <a href="http://sacredartichoke.com/images/pinhole/IMG_9029-01.jpg"target="new">This is another</a> (3 seconds f/64 ISO 100). I'm willing to accept this as what the pinhole photos will look like, but would I get the same type of result with film? Is there any way to minimize this fogging? <p> With a different cap & an aperture of f/180 and shutter time of 15 seconds, <a href="http://sacredartichoke.com/images/pinhole/IMG_9021-01.jpg"target="new">the results are miserable</a>. Is this diffraction making everything so blurry? Would this cap be this bad on a film body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich815 Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 f/64 is much less light, in fact the least for that cap, based on the range of the adjustments you say it has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemcvay Posted July 29, 2005 Author Share Posted July 29, 2005 By "more light," what I meant is more light hitting that area of the sensor compared with the rest of the frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
connealy Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Looks like it could be some flare, maybe from the edges of the aperture or some part of the lens mount. First I had heard of the Loreo. The site doesn't seem to show any details of the construction. Can you tell us anything about those things from looking at it? Maybe the results are something you can live with if you take them into account in using the setup. Weston and the others in the f64 group actually used quite simple rectilinear lenses and got quite astounding results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemcvay Posted July 29, 2005 Author Share Posted July 29, 2005 I hadn't thought of flare. There was a high overcast sky with plenty of fog and I was standing underneath a bridge, but there could have been light reflecting off the river, I suppose. <a href="http://sacredartichoke.com/images/pinhole/fisheye.jpg"target="new">This shot with a Zenitar fisheye on the same camera</a> can give you an idea of what the light was like. <p> <a href="http://sacredartichoke.com/images/pinhole/traincar.jpg"target="new">Here is another example of the same symptom</a>. <p> The Loreo cap does have a glass(?) lens and the fog doesn't show up at the widest apertures. It starts at f/16 and gets worse at f/32 and then really bad at f/64. I know the image from the 20D decreases at small apertures - so I don't know if this is due to that or to the lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grapegeek Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 I tried doing pinhole photos with my Canon 300d (Rebel) and was very disappointed. I took a body cap, drilled a hole in it and then taped a Lenox Laser 150 micron laser drilled pinhole and tried a variety of settings but the best pictures were very blurry, so I gave up... Nothing like the pinhole stuff I've done with regular film and the same pinhole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Yes, at f/180 it's diffraction hitting you hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoopidgerl Posted October 6, 2005 Share Posted October 6, 2005 I can't understand why people would want to stick a pinhole cap on a 20D! What fun is that? If you want the pinhole effect... shoot with a real pinhole camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted October 6, 2005 Share Posted October 6, 2005 << I can't understand why people would want to stick a pinhole cap on a 20D! What fun is that? If you want the pinhole effect... shoot with a real pinhole camera. >> What exactly is a "real" pinhole camera? Is my Zero Image a "real" pinhole but a Quaker Oats can camera not? Maybe the reverse? Is it "real" if you make it yourself and "fake" if you don't? What if Lance made the pinhole body cap himself, does that give him more "cred" in your "real vs not real" argument? Are you serious with this question or are you just trolling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemcvay Posted October 6, 2005 Author Share Posted October 6, 2005 <tt>What fun is that? </tt> <p> Plenty of fun. I like experimenting and messing around with systems where unknown effects are expected. <p> <tt> If you want the pinhole effect... shoot with a real pinhole camera.</tt> <p> Which would be defined as what? I always thought of it as a setup where the light entered through a small aperture. You got a hang-up with rules or something? You've Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancemcvay Posted October 6, 2005 Author Share Posted October 6, 2005 <con't from cut off post>You've obviously had experience with toy cameras and whatnot. Why does the idea of a pinhole cap on a 20D bother you so much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now