Jump to content

Photojournalism and Aesthetics


Recommended Posts

Ed, if you're attempting to suggest that Walski couldn't have manipulated the photo and the blame should be put on the LA Times, you're desperately fighting the known facts.

 

Walski admitted to creating a composite photo in the field. He did it, by his own account, on his laptop while editing and transmitting his pix to the paper. He said he was fooling around and his judgment failed because he was exhausted.

 

Since his manipulation made the picture more dramatic, he made it more likely that the picture would be published -- which it was, as his editors at the LA Times dutifully fell for it and published the most dramatic picture.

 

Your point that editorial staffs bear much more responsibility than reporters and photographers for distorting the news is entirely valid. The reporters and photographers take the blame because the editors are usually anonymous. But that's not to say that reporters and photographers themselves don't participate, sometimes unwittingly, in distorting the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...