What 's your opinion about vr object photo demand?

We have plan to do business with automatic virtual reality object

photo scanner, but I am wondering about prompt demand for the

equipment or vr object photo service considering the current

prevailing 2d photo presentation in internet. We will use other

plug-in which is very simple and fast loaded than Quick Time. But

some web desiners told me they do not like any plug-in.

The newly developed equipment can complete the whole process of vr

photo image of an object within 15 minutes.

Does this business really work? We are now setting up the demo studio

and anxious about the evaluation from photo and internet experts.

Please let me know of your opinion. Some sample will be available at

www.openv3d.com (site may be slow because of hosting problem) and

also I am willing to send CD on your request.

Mr. Kim,

Interesting. I've shot many VR objects spins and VR walkthroughs for my clients over that past year. This looks like it could save time from having to set up everything up manually and then set up software to stitch everything.

VR objects seem take time to load on the web matter how you do it - much of that will be up to your server and the other will be up to the kind of connection/computer the clients are running. And your right web designers do hate plug ins. If something can go wrong it will and it'll start with a plug in.

One thing I didn't like on your site is having to install any software on my computer before I can view something. With the way adware, spyware and viruses go these days - people (myself included) are very reluctant to load anything on their systems that comes off the web.

There is a market for this item - most likely manufacturers and photographers. Would you please e-mail me pricing info on the unit.

Best regards,

Lucas Griego

lucasgriego@hotmail.com

Dear Lucas,

I agree. We are improving our website and if you have any question

please let me know. Anyway, to view vr photo you need plug-in in a certain way. If vr object image can be seen without any plug-in, it may be java based which is already installed in the computer. The v3d

player is of some hundred KB and instant setup. But if people do not want any plug-in, we have to consider to go with java base even though we expect limited function and less efficiency. QTVR.... well.. I don't know... I am wondering who gonna use it.

Anyway, thank you for your opinion.