Jump to content

Black&White negatives -> slides. How???


andreas_carl

Recommended Posts

Positive film will not work, it will give a duplicate negative. Any

straight line negative film should suffice, like T-Max 100 or Delta

100. I would use 4x5 instead of roll film. It is easier to keep flat

to contact the negs on, you can process in a tray or BTZS tubes

and cut down after to mount. It would also allow a step wedge to

be contacted with the negative to monitor processing. You may

be able to contact 2 negatives at a time if you don't want the step

wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I second Art and Walter's suggestion for the "direct positive" style film, which, despite its name, is basically a printing paper emulsion on a film base (from what I understand). Photowarehouse.biz sells it in 8x10 sheets that you can contact-print onto. I tried it last week and got reasonable results for a first try. Be prepared to fiddle with developers to get the contrast right.

 

The "standard" base is pretty thin and I found it tricky to handle. You might want to try the "extra-thick" base. The film is cheap in any case.

 

Kodak sells a Fine-Grain Release Positive film (code 5302) that is hard to find, but a Google search might bring up a vendor -- try electron-microscopy supply houses. It is a 35mm film that comes in 100-ft rolls for about $17. If you have a 35mm camera with a macro lens, you might be able to photograph your 6x6 negs on a lightbox onto this film and get good results. The film can be developed in paper developer. I believe there is an 8x10 version of this film too, but I have never encountered it, and the price Kodak quoted me on it was very high.

 

Both of these films -- the Photowarehouse.biz sheet film and Kodak 5302 -- are pretty much only blue-sensitive. They can be handled under a safelight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we get a few more opinions here? Two guys say positive film. I've never used this stuff, but doesn't it essentially make a duplicate of the original? The question is how to make a projectable B/W slide from a B/W negative. The thing that make me think I (maybe)don't understand positive film is that after another guy saying "Positive film will not work" (just like I think), someone else says "use positive film" (maybe he didn't read the other posts?).

A negative of a negative is a positive, so copying a negative onto negative film will give a positive "transparency". That's what I thought when I tried it. I used Tmax to make slides from Tmax. I got a transparency, but contrast was very low even after underexposing and pushing 1 or 2 stops (don't remember which). Someone at the time suggested using lith film (or something like that it) that records with higher than normal contrast. Maybe someone can chime in with info on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Kodak publication:

 

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/o3/o3.pdf

 

recommends either 5302 or Tech Pan.

 

"Positive film" or "print film" like 5302 or Duratrans for color produces a positive image on a film base from a negative. Duratrans is a display material designed for light boxes like the ones above the registers at a fast-food restaurant. 5302 and the other X302 films in different formats are used for things like making final B&W prints of movies from negatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use a slide duplicator for your hasselblad & shoot onto Scala (B+W transparency film). You could use a colour tranny film, just ensure that your lightsource is balanced well to avoid colour casts. You could even bodge it with a lightbox but I wouldn't recommend it. Otherwise digital transfer & image back to E6 film or take it to a pro lab & they'll interneg it.

 

Gavin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wayne and others are right. Use TechPan sheet film and process per Wayne's figures. K has lots of info on the web and in tech pubs on paper. Your local library or photo club library may be of help. Also your local pro dev shop or litho shop can do this cost effectively if your run (images to reproduce or number or repros per image) is too small to be worth your investment in film and chemistry. Then again, if you have the film and chemistry, other new ideas may become the will for the way in hand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...